Skip to content
WealthTicker

Multi cap: Axis vs WhiteOak vs HSBC vs LIC MF

The four best 3-year multi-cap funds are 1.36 points apart, 17.11% to 18.47% a year to 9 October 2026. Risk, fees, cap mix and managers decide the rest.

·

A round pie chart made of coloured blocks on a grey table, one slice pulled out

Why these four

Twenty-two multi-cap funds have a three-year record. The top four are Axis Multicap at 18.47% a year, WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap at 17.65%, HSBC Multi Cap at 17.34% and LIC MF Multi Cap at 17.11%, against a category median of 13.54%. The top four in large & mid, mid and small caps are 1.8 to 4.7 points apart; here it is 1.36. ₹1 lakh three years ago is about ₹1.66 lakh in the Axis fund today and ₹1.61 lakh in the LIC MF fund, a gap of under ₹6,000.

When returns are this close, the choice turns on other things: how the fund behaved on the way, what it costs, and how it fills the category's rule. A multi-cap fund must hold at least 25% each in large, mid and small caps, which is the difference from a flexi-cap fund, explained here. Figures are for the Direct plan, Growth option, from NAVs to Friday 9 October 2026.

Returns

Fund 1 year 3 years First NAV in our data
Axis 6.70% 18.47% December 2021
WhiteOak Capital 3.42% 17.65% September 2023
HSBC 5.60% 17.34% February 2023
LIC MF 4.91% 17.11% November 2022
Category median 3.08% 13.54%

Three-year figures are compounded annual rates. None of the four has five years; only nine funds in the category do. WhiteOak's fund has barely three.

Over one year Axis is again ahead, eighth of 32 funds. Axis against WhiteOak is the widest one-year gap of the four, 3.28 points, and HSBC against LIC MF the narrowest three-year one, 0.23 points.

Risk

Fund Volatility Worst fall Sharpe Down capture
Axis 14.98% -18.08% 0.80 88.1%
WhiteOak Capital 14.59% -16.93% 0.76 84.8%
HSBC 16.35% -20.07% 0.66 95.4%
LIC MF 15.68% -19.32% 0.68 100.5%

All over three years. The worst fall is the deepest peak-to-trough drop in NAV (max drawdown); down capture compares the fund with the Nifty 500 TRI in the months that index fell.

Here the four split in two. Axis and WhiteOak have the top two Sharpe ratios in the category, the lowest volatility and the smallest falls; WhiteOak fell least, 16.93%. HSBC and LIC MF earned almost as much with more volatility and deeper falls, and LIC MF lost slightly more than the index in its down months. Axis against HSBC shows the difference most clearly: 1.13 points more return for 1.37 points less volatility.

Fees, size and exit load

Fund Direct TER Regular TER Average AUM, Jul–Sep 2026
Axis 0.93% 1.98% ₹11,430 crore
WhiteOak Capital 0.88% 2.21% ₹4,222 crore
HSBC 0.79% 2.03% ₹6,264 crore
LIC MF 0.78% 2.14% ₹2,173 crore

Expense ratios are AMFI's, dated 8 October 2026.

Fees run the other way from risk: LIC MF and HSBC are the cheapest, Axis the dearest, though the whole spread is 0.15 points, ₹1,500 a year on ₹10 lakh. Axis against LIC MF is also the size extreme, a fund five times the other's assets.

Axis and HSBC both let 10% of an investment out free in the first year and charge 1% on the rest, per their Scheme Summary Documents. WhiteOak's October 2026 summary document states no exit load, while its November 2025 scheme information document stated 1% within one month; LIC MF's terms are not in the filings we hold. Check both before investing.

How they fill the 25-25-25

Fund Stocks Top 10 Large / mid / small In equity Portfolio date
Axis 108 22.9% 43 / 33 / 24 95.4% 30 Sep 2026
WhiteOak Capital 194 20.7% 38 / 28 / 35 88.1% 30 Sep 2026
HSBC 101 22.9% 41 / 29 / 30 98.2% 31 Aug 2026
LIC MF 63 26.4% 43 / 28 / 30 94.3% 31 Aug 2026

From each house's monthly disclosure. The cap split is of equity holdings by current market value against AMFI's July 2026 cut-offs, rounded. SEBI's test uses AMFI's six-month averages, so Axis's 24% here is not a breach.

The free 25% goes in different directions. Axis and LIC MF lean to large caps; WhiteOak puts the most into small caps, 35%, while holding 11.9% outside equity in cash, debt and REITs. All four have ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank in their top five, so the large-cap sleeves overlap. The differences sit lower down: LIC MF's largest holding is Garware Hi-Tech Films at 3.91%, and HSBC's is TD Power Systems at 3.01%. WhiteOak against LIC MF is 194 stocks against 63, and HSBC against WhiteOak a stated turnover of 46% against 170%.

Who runs them

What the numbers do not tell you

Three years is the whole life of the youngest fund here and a short record for any of them. A 1.36-point spread in return can reverse in a single year. The three funds with summary documents state the Nifty 500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI as their benchmark; its valuation page shows where that market stands, and our October review of multi-cap funds covers the whole category.

None of this is a recommendation to buy or sell any fund.

Frequently asked questions

Which multi-cap fund has the best 3-year return?

As of 9 October 2026, Axis Multicap (Direct Growth) returned 18.47% a year over three years, first of 22 multi-cap funds with a three-year record. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap made 17.65%, HSBC Multi Cap 17.34% and LIC MF Multi Cap 17.11%; the category median was 13.54%.

Which multi-cap fund fell the least?

Of the four leaders, WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap had the shallowest fall over the three years to 9 October 2026, 16.93% from a peak, and the lowest volatility, 14.59%. HSBC Multi Cap fell the most, 20.07%.

Do multi-cap funds really hold 25% in small caps?

SEBI requires at least 25% in each of large, mid and small caps, measured on AMFI's half-yearly list. By current market value, the four leaders held 24% to 35% of their equity in small caps in their August or September 2026 portfolios.

This is commentary on published data, not investment advice. WealthTicker is not a SEBI-registered adviser or distributor. Figures are WealthTicker’s own calculations from public data — AMFI’s fund NAVs and disclosures, NSE’s index and FII/DII files, and the fund houses’ monthly portfolios (how we calculate). They are as of the dates stated and can be revised by their source.