Skip to content
WealthTicker

431 equity schemes sorted by direct expense ratio band

Of 431 equity schemes in the October 2026 TER file, 171 charge direct-plan fees under 1%, 260 charge 1% or more, and 32 charge 2% or more. The full band table.

·

A magnifying glass over a printed financial report

The file behind the table

AMCs disclose each scheme's total expense ratio (TER) for the regular and direct plan. The most recent disclosure in our database is dated 22 October 2026 and covers 1,513 schemes. This post uses the 431 equity-oriented schemes in it that report both a regular and a direct TER above zero.

For each, the direct plan TER is the one that matters if you invest without a distributor. Here is how the 431 distribute:

Direct TER band Schemes Share
Under 0.5% 2 0.5%
0.5% to under 1.0% 169 39.2%
1.0% to under 1.5% 172 39.9%
1.5% to under 2.0% 56 13.0%
2.0% and above 32 7.4%
Total 431 100%

Sixty percent (260 of 431) of these schemes charge 1% or more even in the direct plan. Just 171, about 40%, charge less than 1%.

Averages

  • Average direct TER: 1.22%
  • Average regular TER: 2.47%
  • Highest direct TER in the file: 4.86%
  • Regular-plan TER of 2.5% or more: 183 schemes, 42% of the 431

The average gap between regular and direct is 1.25 percentage points. On a ₹10 lakh holding that is about ₹12,500 a year, every year, which is the commission built into the regular plan.

Where the highest costs sit

Cost differs by category as well as by scheme. Median direct TER by category, from the same file, for categories with at least ten schemes:

Category Schemes Median direct TER Median regular TER
Sectoral / Thematic (one of three labels) 87 1.29% 2.61%
Value 10 1.20% 2.32%
Large Cap (two labels combined, see note) 29 1.09%–1.18% 2.33%–2.41%
Focused 13 1.16% 2.35%
Flexi Cap 40 0.90%–1.07% 2.17%–2.26%
Mid Cap 28 0.92%–0.95% 2.00%–2.21%
Small Cap 30 0.89%–0.92% 2.10%–2.21%

The file uses two spellings for several categories ("Equity Scheme" and "Equity Schemes"), so the table gives the range across the two. The pattern holds either way: sectoral and thematic schemes are the costliest at the median, and mid-cap and small-cap funds sit at the bottom of the equity range.

Reading the bands

  • 0.5% to 1.0% holds 169 schemes.
  • 1.0% to 1.5% is the largest single group, 172 schemes.
  • 2.0% and above is a minority, 32 schemes, but a 2% annual cost equals a fifth of a 10% annual return.

None of this ranks quality. A scheme in the 1.5% band can still beat one in the 0.5% band after costs. But if two funds are otherwise close, the cheaper one starts ahead. The TER is also not the whole cost: it excludes exit loads, brokerage on purchases and any tax.

How a band becomes rupees

The table above is a ladder; here is what each rung costs on ₹10 lakh a year:

Direct TER Cost per year on ₹10 lakh
0.75% ₹7,500
1.25% ₹12,500
1.75% ₹17,500
2.25% ₹22,500

Costs compound against you the same way returns compound for you: see expense ratio in rupees per day on ₹10 lakh and the direct vs regular gap in 2026.

Checking your own fund

Open any fund's page to see its regular and direct TER side by side, or use the screener to filter by expense ratio. If you hold a regular plan and want to understand what switching changes, the direct vs regular calculator walkthrough shows the arithmetic, including the tax consequences of moving.

TER disclosures dated 22 October 2026; 431 equity-oriented schemes reporting both plans. Figures as of 2 November 2026.

Frequently asked questions

What is the TER?

The total expense ratio is the annual cost of running a fund as a percentage of its assets. It is deducted daily from the NAV, so you never see a separate charge.

Why is the regular plan's TER higher?

Regular plans include a distributor commission, which direct plans do not. In this file the average regular TER is 2.47% against 1.22% for direct.

Does a low TER guarantee better returns?

No. It removes a cost, but returns depend mostly on what the fund owns. A low TER is a head start, not a result.

This is commentary on published data, not investment advice. WealthTicker is not a SEBI-registered adviser or distributor. Figures are WealthTicker’s own calculations from public data — AMFI’s fund NAVs and disclosures, NSE’s index and FII/DII files, and the fund houses’ monthly portfolios (how we calculate). They are as of the dates stated and can be revised by their source.