The number
For an equity mutual fund, the regular plan costs a median 1.16 percentage points a year more than the direct plan of the same scheme.
That is from the expense ratios fund houses report to AMFI, as published at the end of September 2026. It covers 543 equity schemes at least a year old that report both plans.
The two plans hold the same portfolio, run by the same manager. The difference is the trail commission paid to the distributor who sold you the regular plan, which comes out of the fund's assets every day you hold it.
The gap by asset class
| Schemes | Direct (median) | Regular (median) | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | 543 | 1.07% | 2.24% | 1.16 |
| Hybrid | 171 | 1.08% | 2.14% | 1.06 |
| Solution-oriented | 41 | 1.18% | 2.23% | 1.02 |
| Index funds | 331 | 0.35% | 0.91% | 0.47 |
| Fund of funds | 166 | 0.20% | 0.62% | 0.43 |
| Debt | 326 | 0.31% | 0.72% | 0.37 |
| All | 1,578 | 0.69% | 1.45% | 0.70 |
The gap tracks how much a fund charges in the first place. Equity and hybrid funds, the most expensive to own, carry the widest gap. Index and debt funds carry the narrowest.
In every category the median regular plan costs more. Only five schemes, all fund of funds, report a regular expense ratio at or below the direct one.
Category by category
| Category | Direct | Regular | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced advantage | 1.04% | 2.30% | 1.25 |
| Sectoral / thematic | 1.16% | 2.36% | 1.22 |
| Flexi cap | 0.92% | 2.14% | 1.20 |
| Aggressive hybrid | 1.01% | 2.21% | 1.18 |
| Small cap | 0.85% | 2.01% | 1.11 |
| Large cap | 1.06% | 2.20% | 1.10 |
| Mid cap | 0.95% | 2.03% | 1.06 |
| ELSS | 1.10% | 1.95% | 0.91 |
| Gilt | 0.50% | 1.18% | 0.64 |
| Short duration | 0.38% | 0.98% | 0.60 |
| Index funds | 0.35% | 0.91% | 0.47 |
| Corporate bond | 0.34% | 0.68% | 0.33 |
| Liquid | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.10 |
| Overnight | 0.10% | 0.18% | 0.07 |
Each column is a separate median, so the gap column is the median of each scheme's own gap rather than the difference between the two medians.
In a liquid or overnight fund the gap is a tenth of a point or less. In a flexi cap or balanced advantage fund it is more than a full point. The one-off choice of plan matters most in exactly the funds people tend to hold longest.
What it compounded to
An expense ratio is a forecast of cost. The NAVs show what it actually cost.
For each scheme that has had both a direct and a regular Growth plan for ten years, we compared the two plans' ten-year returns to 30 September 2026.
| Schemes | Direct ahead by, a year | Direct ended larger by | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | 217 | 1.10 points | 10.2% |
| Hybrid | 72 | 0.99 points | 9.5% |
| Index funds | 16 | 0.43 points | 4.0% |
| Debt | 182 | 0.54 points | 5.2% |
| All | 552 | 0.84 points | 7.8% |
Both columns are medians across schemes. So for the typical equity fund, ₹10 lakh in the direct plan ten years ago would now be worth about 10.2% more than ₹10 lakh in the regular plan of the same fund. Nothing else differed: same stocks, same manager, same days.
Over five years the equity gap was 1.23 points a year, across 323 schemes, close to the fee gap AMFI reports today.
What this does not tell you
The commission pays for something. A regular plan's extra cost buys a distributor's help: choosing funds, paperwork, sometimes a nudge not to sell in a crash. If that advice is worth more than a point a year to you, the regular plan can still be the right choice.
Today's expense ratio is not the one charged for ten years. SEBI has cut the caps more than once, so the fee gap over the last decade was not constant. The ten-year table measures what was actually charged.
Switching plans can trigger tax. Moving from a regular to a direct plan counts as a redemption and a fresh purchase, so it can create a capital gain. Many schemes waive the exit load on a switch between plans of the same scheme; the scheme's documents say whether yours does.
Where to go from here
The direct vs regular calculator works through your own amount and horizon, and the impact of 1% shows how a fee difference compounds. The guides on direct vs regular plans and what a fund really costs explain the mechanics.
For the dearest equity funds by expense ratio, see the highest-cost equity funds. For the cheapest end of the market, see Nifty 50 index funds ranked by cost.
For how active large-cap funds did against their index after costs, see large-cap funds vs the Nifty 50.
Frequently asked questions
How much more does a regular plan cost than a direct plan?
Across 543 equity schemes at least a year old, the median regular plan's expense ratio was 2.24% at the end of September 2026, against 1.07% for the direct plan: a gap of 1.16 percentage points a year. For debt schemes the median gap was 0.37 points.
How much does the direct-regular gap add up to over ten years?
For 217 equity schemes with ten years of both plans, the direct plan's annual return beat the regular plan's by a median 1.10 points over the ten years to 30 September 2026. Compounded, the direct plan ended a median 10.2% larger than the regular one.
Why is a regular plan more expensive?
The extra cost pays the distributor who sold the fund, as a trail commission taken from the fund's assets every year. The portfolio is the same; a direct plan, bought straight from the fund house or a direct platform, leaves that commission out.
This is commentary on published data, not investment advice. WealthTicker is not a SEBI-registered adviser or distributor. Figures are as of the dates stated and can be revised by their source.
Keep reading
Nifty 50 index funds: tracking error and the cost gap
14 Nifty 50 index funds returned 5.50% to 6.20% a year over five years to 30 September 2026, against an estimated 6.49% for the index. Fees explain the gap.
Arbitrage funds vs liquid funds: the 2026 scorecard
The median arbitrage fund returned 6.68% in the year to 30 September 2026, against 6.46% for liquid funds. Where each came out ahead, and what it cost.
Balanced advantage funds in 2026's falling market
The Nifty 50 fell 13.4% from 31 December 2025 to 30 September 2026. The median balanced advantage fund lost 1.7%, and its worst dip was 8.7%.
