Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs Mirae Asset Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and Mirae Asset Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 01 Sep 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectMirae Asset Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 21 Feb 202301 Sep 2026, limited by Mirae Asset Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundMirae Asset Gold ETFGold
21 Feb 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
08 Jun 2023₹105.61₹105.45₹105.06
24 Sep 2023₹104.59₹104.50₹104.06
09 Jan 2024₹111.21₹110.24₹109.86
25 Apr 2024₹127.19₹126.62₹126.11
11 Aug 2024₹121.99₹122.11₹121.55
26 Nov 2024₹132.75₹132.53₹131.35
13 Mar 2025₹153.00₹151.23₹150.89
29 Jun 2025₹168.05₹166.41₹165.38
14 Oct 2025₹218.18₹217.72₹217.76
29 Jan 2026₹302.22₹301.22₹303.63
17 May 2026₹274.61₹271.44₹268.15
01 Sep 2026₹265.62₹262.76₹271.14
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, Mirae Asset Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹127.94
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
Mirae Asset
NAV ₹147.77
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
+46.05%Best in row+45.23%
+36.04%Best in row+35.71%
+25.52%
+16.14%
+14.36%+31.52%Best in row
+31.99%+36.91%Best in row
+12.32%+35.17%Best in row
+10.43%
+8.86%
Risk
19.82%18.94%Best in row
1.491.54Best in row
2.122.21Best in row
-29.80%-22.10%Best in row
-2.05%-1.50%Best in row
1.071.03
100.5%Best in row97.4%
106.8%97.6%Best in row
0.59%0.35%Best in row
₹3,315Cr₹3,251Cr
Sharwan Kumar Goyal
13 Apr 200721 Feb 2023
9 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Exit load
Lock-in
Min SIP
Min lumpsum
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Mirae Asset Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +36.04% CAGR against Mirae Asset Gold ETF's +35.71%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Mirae Asset Gold ETF?

Mirae Asset Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund charges 0.59% a year against Mirae Asset Gold ETF's 0.35%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Mirae Asset Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.82% annualized vs Mirae Asset Gold ETF's +18.94%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs Mirae Asset Gold ETF -22.10%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Mirae Asset Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,315Cr against Mirae Asset Gold ETF's ₹3,251Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and Mirae Asset Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.