Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 05 Oct 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 31 Jul 2023 – 01 Oct 2026, limited by LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded FundGold
31 Jul 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
05 Nov 2023₹102.87₹102.91₹102.25
09 Feb 2024₹104.66₹104.69₹104.72
16 May 2024₹122.95₹123.05₹122.38
20 Aug 2024₹120.07₹120.16₹119.76
25 Nov 2024₹127.62₹127.77₹127.08
01 Mar 2025₹141.79₹141.27₹140.35
06 Jun 2025₹162.53₹162.27₹160.34
10 Sep 2025₹181.03₹180.99₹179.43
16 Dec 2025₹218.92₹218.05₹216.27
22 Mar 2026₹244.17₹241.63₹238.97
27 Jun 2026₹230.93₹230.49₹226.92
01 Oct 2026₹243.48₹243.00₹239.70
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹123.72
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
LIC
NAV ₹132.23
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
+25.59%+25.53%
+35.90%+36.82%Best in row
+25.15%—
+15.62%—
+14.09%+32.11%
+29.81%+34.36%Best in row
+12.44%+35.67%Best in row
+10.51%—
+8.92%—
Risk
19.94%19.77%Best in row
1.471.53Best in row
2.102.17Best in row
-29.80%-20.22%
-1.42%+0.01%Best in row
1.091.03
102.8%103.1%
104.7%Best in row106.3%
—0.45%
₹3,315Cr₹1,420Cr
—None
Ayush JainSumit Bhatnagar · 0.5y
13 Apr 200731 Jul 2023
1.1%1.8%
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Exit load
None
Min SIP
—
Min lumpsum
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

Over the last 3 years, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +36.82% CAGR against UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund's +35.90%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.94% annualized vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's +19.77%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund -20.22%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,315Cr against LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's ₹1,420Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.