Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs HDFC Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and HDFC Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 16 Oct 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectHDFC Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 16 Aug 2010 – 16 Oct 2026, limited by HDFC Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold (ETF NAV) history starts 07 Nov 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundHDFC Gold ETF
16 Aug 2010₹100.00₹100.00
21 Dec 2011₹148.04₹147.55
26 Apr 2013₹140.99₹140.41
31 Aug 2014₹142.37₹142.06
05 Jan 2016₹129.12₹128.57
11 May 2017₹140.84₹139.60
16 Sep 2018₹150.77₹150.47
21 Jan 2020₹194.91₹193.27
27 May 2021₹233.74₹233.35
01 Oct 2022₹237.21₹238.35
05 Feb 2024₹290.37₹291.00
11 Jun 2025₹448.37₹442.06
16 Oct 2026₹668.67₹663.43
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, HDFC Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹122.13
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
HDFC
NAV ₹123.99
Moderately High risk
Unrated
+15.07%Best in row+14.15%
+34.51%Best in row+33.97%
+23.93%Best in row+23.71%
+16.03%+16.07%
+13.99%+12.42%
+28.74%Best in row+28.43%
+12.55%Best in row+9.98%
+10.61%Best in row+9.14%
+8.99%+9.09%
Risk
19.94%19.69%Best in row
1.411.40
2.001.99
-29.80%-29.59%
+0.35%+0.26%
1.011.00
101.8%Best in row100.2%
101.3%99.2%Best in row
—0.59%
₹3,414Cr₹23,492Cr
Ayush JainBhagyesh Kagalkar · 4.7y
05 Mar 200713 Aug 2010
1.2%1.5%
8 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Exit load
None
Lock-in
—
Min SIP
—
Min lumpsum
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +34.51% CAGR against HDFC Gold ETF's +33.97%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund +23.93% vs HDFC Gold ETF +23.71% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.94% annualized vs HDFC Gold ETF's +19.69%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs HDFC Gold ETF -22.27%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

HDFC Gold ETF is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,414Cr against HDFC Gold ETF's ₹23,492Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and HDFC Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.