Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs HDFC Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and HDFC Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectHDFC Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 16 Aug 201020 Aug 2026, limited by HDFC Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold history starts 25 Jul 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundHDFC Gold ETF
16 Aug 2010₹100.00₹100.00
16 Dec 2011₹144.14₹143.68
17 Apr 2013₹133.59₹133.06
17 Aug 2014₹146.36₹146.02
17 Dec 2015₹128.13₹127.60
18 Apr 2017₹148.13₹146.82
18 Aug 2018₹144.33₹144.12
18 Dec 2019₹185.36₹183.78
19 Apr 2021₹227.69₹227.33
19 Aug 2022₹244.36₹245.25
19 Dec 2023₹291.41₹290.36
20 Apr 2025₹443.09₹436.82
20 Aug 2026₹717.83₹712.05
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, HDFC Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹131.11
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
HDFC
NAV ₹133.08
Moderately High risk
★★☆☆☆ CAT
+57.58%Best in row+57.23%
+38.05%Best in row+37.59%
+26.14%Best in row+25.92%
+14.53%Best in row+13.04%
+33.15%Best in row+32.82%
+12.28%Best in row+9.65%
+10.42%Best in row+8.89%
+8.84%+8.88%
Risk
19.66%19.40%Best in row
2.292.30
-29.80%-29.59%Best in row
-1.83%-1.56%Best in row
1.091.07
102.6%Best in row99.7%
106.8%98.7%Best in row
0.59%0.60%
₹3,315Cr₹23,426Cr
₹1.18L
Sharwan Kumar GoyalBhagyesh Kagalkar
13 Apr 200716 Aug 2010
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
10Y return (CAGR)
+16.06%
Sharpe
1.60
Benchmark
Gold
Exit load
Lock-in
Min SIP
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +38.05% CAGR against HDFC Gold ETF's +37.59%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund +26.14% vs HDFC Gold ETF +25.92% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has the lower expense ratio: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund charges 0.59% a year against HDFC Gold ETF's 0.60%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.66% annualized vs HDFC Gold ETF's +19.40%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs HDFC Gold ETF -22.27%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or HDFC Gold ETF?

HDFC Gold ETF is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,315Cr against HDFC Gold ETF's ₹23,426Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and HDFC Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.