Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs Edelweiss Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and Edelweiss Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 19 Oct 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectEdelweiss Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 08 Nov 2023 – 19 Oct 2026, limited by Edelweiss Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundEdelweiss Gold ETFGold (ETF NAV)
08 Nov 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
06 Feb 2024₹102.80₹103.23₹103.12
05 May 2024₹117.11₹117.11₹117.16
03 Aug 2024₹115.29₹115.66₹115.55
01 Nov 2024₹130.59₹130.07₹130.05
29 Jan 2025₹133.04₹132.16₹132.05
29 Apr 2025₹157.55₹155.79₹155.88
28 Jul 2025₹160.54₹159.53₹159.55
25 Oct 2025₹205.05₹196.65₹196.96
23 Jan 2026₹248.86₹247.61₹248.33
23 Apr 2026₹244.22₹241.25₹241.69
21 Jul 2026₹231.88₹229.23₹229.36
19 Oct 2026₹235.70₹233.00₹233.00
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, Edelweiss Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹121.68
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
Edelweiss
NAV ₹144.55
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
+11.85%Best in row+11.08%
+33.66%Best in row+33.26%
+24.02%—
+15.95%—
+13.96%+33.26%
+28.54%—
+12.55%—
+10.60%—
+8.97%—
Risk
19.96%19.16%Best in row
1.361.40
1.931.99Best in row
-29.80%-22.09%
+0.35%Best in row+0.22%
1.010.99
101.8%Best in row99.3%
101.3%98.1%Best in row
—0.50%
₹3,414Cr₹1,709Cr
—₹25.00Cr
Ayush JainAmit Vora · 2.3y
05 Mar 200707 Nov 2023
1.2%2.3%
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Exit load
None
Lock-in
—
Min SIP
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +33.66% CAGR against Edelweiss Gold ETF's +33.26%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.96% annualized vs Edelweiss Gold ETF's +19.16%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs Edelweiss Gold ETF -22.09%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,414Cr against Edelweiss Gold ETF's ₹1,709Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and Edelweiss Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.