Skip to content
WealthTicker

Quantum Gold ETF vs Edelweiss Gold ETF

Quantum Gold ETF and Edelweiss Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 19 Oct 2026

Quantum Gold ETFEdelweiss Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 08 Nov 2023 – 19 Oct 2026, limited by Edelweiss Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateQuantum Gold ETFEdelweiss Gold ETFGold (ETF NAV)
08 Nov 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
06 Feb 2024₹102.96₹103.23₹103.12
05 May 2024₹116.82₹117.11₹117.16
03 Aug 2024₹115.44₹115.66₹115.55
01 Nov 2024₹129.97₹130.07₹130.05
29 Jan 2025₹131.68₹132.16₹132.05
29 Apr 2025₹156.17₹155.79₹155.88
28 Jul 2025₹159.39₹159.53₹159.55
25 Oct 2025₹196.86₹196.65₹196.96
23 Jan 2026₹248.96₹247.61₹248.33
23 Apr 2026₹242.45₹241.25₹241.69
21 Jul 2026₹230.19₹229.23₹229.36
19 Oct 2026₹234.00₹233.00₹233.00
Quantum Gold ETF, Edelweiss Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
Quantum
NAV ₹119.82
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
Edelweiss
NAV ₹144.55
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
Category median
Gold ETF · 11 funds
+10.82%+11.08%Best in row+11.08%
+33.31%+33.26%+33.23%
+23.83%—+23.93%
+15.84%—+15.84%
+12.99%+33.26%+28.48%
+28.34%——
+11.78%—+17.66%
+9.62%—+9.93%
+8.72%—+8.75%
Risk
19.63%19.16%Best in row19.42%
1.371.401.38
1.951.991.96
-29.70%-22.09%-22.13%
-0.21%+0.22%Best in row+0.29%
1.020.990.99
101.0%Best in row99.3%100.2%
100.9%98.1%Best in row99.1%
0.61%0.50%Best in row0.50%
₹754.05Cr₹1,709Cr₹2,633Cr
—₹25.00Cr—
Chirag Mehta · 2.4yAmit Vora · 2.3y—
22 Feb 200807 Nov 2023—
—2.3%—
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Exit load
None
Lock-in
—
Min SIP
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Quantum Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, Quantum Gold ETF returned +33.31% CAGR against Edelweiss Gold ETF's +33.26%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Quantum Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Edelweiss Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: Quantum Gold ETF charges 0.61% a year against Edelweiss Gold ETF's 0.50%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Quantum Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Quantum Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.63% annualized vs Edelweiss Gold ETF's +19.16%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Quantum Gold ETF -22.34% vs Edelweiss Gold ETF -22.09%.

Which fund manages more money — Quantum Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Edelweiss Gold ETF is the larger fund: Quantum Gold ETF manages ₹754.05Cr against Edelweiss Gold ETF's ₹1,709Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Quantum Gold ETF and Edelweiss Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.