Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund
Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund (Direct) and Tata Ultra Short Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Ultra Short Duration Fund schemes — see the best ultra short duration mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 23 Jan 2019 – 25 Aug 2026, limited by Tata Ultra Short Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund | Tata Ultra Short Term Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Jan 2019 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 11 Sep 2019 | ₹103.39 | ₹105.17 |
| 29 Apr 2020 | ₹102.23 | ₹109.44 |
| 16 Dec 2020 | ₹106.46 | ₹113.15 |
| 04 Aug 2021 | ₹113.93 | ₹115.92 |
| 23 Mar 2022 | ₹117.29 | ₹118.84 |
| 09 Nov 2022 | ₹121.08 | ₹122.34 |
| 27 Jun 2023 | ₹126.90 | ₹128.03 |
| 13 Feb 2024 | ₹132.74 | ₹133.93 |
| 01 Oct 2024 | ₹139.50 | ₹140.52 |
| 20 May 2025 | ₹146.75 | ₹147.76 |
| 06 Jan 2026 | ₹153.02 | ₹153.97 |
| 25 Aug 2026 | ₹159.83 | ₹160.90 |
| Metric | Nippon India · Direct NAV ₹4,801.17 Low risk ★★★★☆ | Tata · Direct NAV ₹16.10 Low risk ★★★☆☆ | Category median Ultra Short Duration Fund · 25 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +6.91% | +6.89% | +6.48% | |
| +7.58% | +7.50% | +7.24% | |
| +6.94%Best in row | +6.72% | +6.52% | |
| +6.60%Best in row | +6.47% | +6.77% | |
| +7.39% | +7.29% | — | |
| +6.75%Best in row | +6.14% | +6.74% | |
| +6.75%Best in row | +6.15% | +6.33% | |
| Risk | |||
| 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
| -5.24% | -0.71%Best in row | -0.95% | |
| 0.34% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
| — | ₹5,343Cr | ₹3,302Cr | |
| ₹100 | ₹500 | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹5.00K | — | |
| Vivek Sharma · 12.9y | Dhawal Joshi · 0.9y | — | |
| 21 May 2018 | 23 Jan 2019 | — | |
| 6.3% | -3.5% | — | |
14 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- 10Y return (CAGR)
- —
- 10Y rolling avg
- —
- Sharpe
- —
- Sortino
- —
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Exit load
- None
- Lock-in
- None
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund returned +7.58% CAGR against Tata Ultra Short Term Fund's +7.50%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund +6.94% vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund +6.72% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?
Tata Ultra Short Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund charges 0.34% a year against Tata Ultra Short Term Fund's 0.33%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?
Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.38% annualized vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund's +0.37%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund -0.09% vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund -0.09%.
Are Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund and Tata Ultra Short Term Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Ultra Short Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.