Skip to content
WealthTicker

Mirae Asset Gold ETF vs Edelweiss Gold ETF

Mirae Asset Gold ETF and Edelweiss Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 27 Oct 2026

Mirae Asset Gold ETFEdelweiss Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 08 Nov 2023 – 27 Oct 2026, limited by Edelweiss Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateMirae Asset Gold ETFEdelweiss Gold ETFGold (ETF NAV)
08 Nov 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
06 Feb 2024₹103.18₹103.23₹103.12
07 May 2024₹118.04₹118.04₹117.90
05 Aug 2024₹114.31₹114.31₹114.18
03 Nov 2024₹130.14₹130.07₹130.05
02 Feb 2025₹134.54₹134.42₹134.33
03 May 2025₹152.89₹152.63₹152.68
01 Aug 2025₹159.47₹159.09₹159.10
31 Oct 2025₹195.42₹194.81₹195.08
29 Jan 2026₹281.89₹280.76₹281.84
29 Apr 2026₹237.83₹236.85₹237.24
29 Jul 2026₹228.61₹227.64₹227.75
27 Oct 2026₹226.91₹225.89₹225.81
Mirae Asset Gold ETF, Edelweiss Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
Mirae Asset
NAV ₹136.35
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
Edelweiss
NAV ₹140.14
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
Category median
Gold ETF · 11 funds
+15.68%Best in row+15.52%+15.62%
+31.10%+31.60%Best in row+31.10%
+27.21%+31.60%+27.21%
+34.89%—+17.62%
Risk
1.291.311.27
1.831.871.81
-22.10%-22.09%-22.13%
+0.34%Best in row+0.22%+0.29%
99.8%99.3%100.2%
0.35%Best in row0.50%0.50%
₹3,371Cr₹1,709Cr₹2,633Cr
—₹25.00Cr—
34%—32%
Ritesh Patel · 3.7yAmit Vora · 2.3y—
20 Feb 202307 Nov 2023—
2.2%2.3%—
14 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
5Y return (CAGR)
—
10Y return (CAGR)
—
5Y SIP XIRR
—
5Y rolling avg
—
10Y rolling avg
—
Volatility
19.13%
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Beta
0.99
Downside capture
98.1%
Exit load
None
Lock-in
—
Min SIP
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Mirae Asset Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, Edelweiss Gold ETF returned +31.60% CAGR against Mirae Asset Gold ETF's +31.10%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Mirae Asset Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Mirae Asset Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: Mirae Asset Gold ETF charges 0.35% a year against Edelweiss Gold ETF's 0.50%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Mirae Asset Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Edelweiss Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.13% annualized vs Mirae Asset Gold ETF's +19.13%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Mirae Asset Gold ETF -22.10% vs Edelweiss Gold ETF -22.09%.

Which fund manages more money — Mirae Asset Gold ETF or Edelweiss Gold ETF?

Mirae Asset Gold ETF is the larger fund: Mirae Asset Gold ETF manages ₹3,371Cr against Edelweiss Gold ETF's ₹1,709Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Mirae Asset Gold ETF and Edelweiss Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.