Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund
Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund (Direct) and UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are FoF Domestic schemes — see the best domestic fund of funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 21 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 25 Apr 2023 – 21 Aug 2026, limited by UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund | UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Apr 2023 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 04 Aug 2023 | ₹96.18 | ₹89.84 |
| 13 Nov 2023 | ₹92.94 | ₹88.52 |
| 23 Feb 2024 | ₹93.02 | ₹87.48 |
| 03 Jun 2024 | ₹118.36 | ₹114.15 |
| 12 Sep 2024 | ₹109.29 | ₹103.47 |
| 22 Dec 2024 | ₹111.78 | ₹106.07 |
| 02 Apr 2025 | ₹130.21 | ₹123.09 |
| 12 Jul 2025 | ₹143.24 | ₹135.52 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | ₹196.71 | ₹187.14 |
| 31 Jan 2026 | ₹378.23 | ₹357.15 |
| 12 May 2026 | ₹336.76 | ₹317.72 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | ₹312.03 | ₹293.06 |
| Metric | Kotak Mahindra · Direct NAV ₹32.55 High risk ★★★★☆ | UTI · Direct NAV ₹31.09 High risk ★★★★★ | Category median FoF Domestic · 151 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +112.96%Best in row | +111.39% | +8.79% | |
| +48.96% | +49.07%Best in row | +14.76% | |
| +40.31%Best in row | +38.20% | +11.38% | |
| +57.15% | +57.83%Best in row | — | |
| +47.28% | +47.55%Best in row | +13.06% | |
| Risk | |||
| 39.88% | 39.32%Best in row | 15.94% | |
| 1.06 | 1.08 | 0.81 | |
| 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.12 | |
| -45.61% | -45.48%Best in row | -19.45% | |
| 0.28% | 0.13%Best in row | 0.17% | |
| ₹981.83Cr | ₹620.81Cr | ₹228.08Cr | |
| Up to 0.50% | 1.00% | — | |
| ₹5.00K | ₹100 | — | |
| Abhishek Bisen | Ayush Jain | — | |
| 11 Apr 2023 | 25 Apr 2023 | — | |
| 0.8% | -0.1% | — | |
14 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- 5Y return (CAGR)
- —
- 10Y return (CAGR)
- —
- 5Y rolling avg
- —
- 10Y rolling avg
- —
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Lock-in
- None
- Min SIP
- ₹100
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Over the last 3 years, UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund returned +49.07% CAGR against Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund's +48.96%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund charges 0.28% a year against UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund's 0.13%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund has shown higher volatility (+39.88% annualized vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund's +39.32%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund -45.61% vs UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund -45.48%.
Which fund manages more money — Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund or UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund?
Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund manages ₹981.83Cr against UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund's ₹620.81Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are Kotak Silver ETF Fund of Fund and UTI Silver ETF Fund of Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are FoF Domestic schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.