Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Gold ETF vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF

Kotak Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

Kotak Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 26 Aug 201025 Aug 2026, limited by ICICI Prudential Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold history starts 25 Jul 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF
26 Aug 2010₹100.00₹100.00
26 Dec 2011₹143.54₹99.64
26 Apr 2013₹138.79₹154.45
26 Aug 2014₹139.97₹134.63
26 Dec 2015₹125.78₹134.63
26 Apr 2017₹141.69₹134.63
26 Aug 2018₹142.02₹141.34
25 Dec 2019₹182.31₹181.30
25 Apr 2021₹223.33₹220.87
25 Aug 2022₹242.73₹240.23
25 Dec 2023₹288.60₹285.72
25 Apr 2025₹432.83₹429.01
25 Aug 2026₹722.11₹716.20
Kotak Gold ETF, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra
NAV ₹133.85
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
ICICI Prudential
NAV ₹137.29
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Gold ETF · 25 funds
+59.27%+59.33%+58.71%
+38.69%+38.78%+38.68%
+26.59%+26.66%+26.61%
+16.51%+16.51%
+15.34%Best in row+13.10%+32.83%
+34.17%+34.27%Best in row
+11.98%+16.46%Best in row+12.14%
+10.04%+14.78%Best in row+9.44%
+8.71%Best in row+7.02%+8.76%
Risk
19.12%19.15%19.63%
1.681.691.69
2.422.432.45
-29.84%-22.22%Best in row-22.15%
-1.51%-1.33%Best in row-1.52%
1.061.051.06
99.5%99.7%99.5%
98.8%98.9%98.9%
0.52%0.49%Best in row0.50%
₹14,430Cr₹26,432Cr₹1,628Cr
None
₹1.15L
Abhishek BisenAshwini Bharucha
30 Jul 200726 Aug 2010
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Lock-in
Min SIP
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF returned +38.78% CAGR against Kotak Gold ETF's +38.69%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Gold ETF +26.59% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF +26.66% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Gold ETF charges 0.52% a year against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's 0.49%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.15% annualized vs Kotak Gold ETF's +19.12%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Gold ETF -22.27% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF -22.22%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF is the larger fund: Kotak Gold ETF manages ₹14,430Cr against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's ₹26,432Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.