Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Gold ETF vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF

Kotak Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 26 Oct 2026

Kotak Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 26 Aug 2010 – 26 Oct 2026, limited by ICICI Prudential Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold (ETF NAV) history starts 07 Nov 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF
26 Aug 2010₹100.00₹100.00
31 Dec 2011₹141.79₹99.64
06 May 2013₹139.68₹154.45
10 Sep 2014₹137.17₹134.63
15 Jan 2016₹128.81₹134.63
21 May 2017₹141.70₹134.63
26 Sep 2018₹148.18₹147.44
31 Jan 2020₹194.10₹193.00
06 Jun 2021₹228.62₹226.07
11 Oct 2022₹235.42₹233.00
15 Feb 2024₹282.62₹279.81
21 Jun 2025₹446.12₹442.26
26 Oct 2026₹632.67₹627.85
Kotak Gold ETF, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra
NAV ₹117.27
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
ICICI Prudential
NAV ₹120.35
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Gold ETF · 11 funds
+15.16%+15.20%+15.20%
+31.12%+31.22%Best in row+31.11%
+22.91%+22.99%+22.92%
+15.54%—+15.47%
+14.41%+12.03%+27.32%
+27.04%+27.15%Best in row—
+12.20%+17.64%Best in row+17.64%
+10.20%+16.48%Best in row+9.91%
+8.83%Best in row+7.36%+8.75%
Risk
19.41%19.44%19.44%
1.801.811.81
-29.84%-22.22%-22.13%
0.991.000.99
100.2%100.3%100.2%
0.52%0.49%Best in row0.50%
₹14,346Cr₹27,185Cr₹2,633Cr
₹1.15L——
Abhishek BisenNishit Patel—
27 Jul 200724 Aug 2010—
1.5%1.9%—
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Sharpe
1.27
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Alpha
+0.29%
Downside capture
99.1%
Exit load
None
Lock-in
—
Min SIP
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF returned +31.22% CAGR against Kotak Gold ETF's +31.12%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Gold ETF +22.91% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF +22.99% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Gold ETF charges 0.52% a year against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's 0.49%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.44% annualized vs Kotak Gold ETF's +19.41%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Gold ETF -22.27% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF -22.22%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF is the larger fund: Kotak Gold ETF manages ₹14,346Cr against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's ₹27,185Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.