Skip to content
WealthTicker

JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund

JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund (Direct) and WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are ELSS schemes — see the best elss (tax saving) mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 08 Oct 2026

JM ELSS - Tax Saver FundDirectWhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 17 Oct 2022 – 08 Oct 2026, limited by WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateJM ELSS - Tax Saver FundWhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver FundNifty 500 TRI
17 Oct 2022₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
15 Feb 2023₹103.25₹99.34₹101.33
16 Jun 2023₹115.58₹110.36₹109.53
15 Oct 2023₹125.05₹121.99₹118.21
13 Feb 2024₹142.22₹137.84₹135.02
13 Jun 2024₹170.54₹157.90₹151.20
12 Oct 2024₹188.26₹177.94₹162.29
10 Feb 2025₹168.98₹165.90₹147.45
11 Jun 2025₹177.93₹181.10₹161.66
10 Oct 2025₹184.39₹183.56₹162.28
08 Feb 2026₹179.56₹181.23₹163.57
09 Jun 2026₹178.68₹177.39₹156.75
08 Oct 2026₹187.49₹182.11₹151.98

Portfolio overlap (same stocks held through more than one fund)

Some overlap is structural: SEBI defines large cap as the top 100 stocks by market capitalisation, so two large-cap funds are fishing the same pond by regulation. The bands below are measured per sleeve pairing rather than against one blanket threshold. How this is measured →

3011731.6%24 in both
  • 30 stocks only in JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund
  • 24 stocks in both — 31.6% of each portfolio by weight
  • 117 stocks only in WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund

The more the circles overlap, the more the funds hold the same stocks.

JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund and WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund share 32% of their equity book by weight.

Shared holdings — JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund

Stocks held by both JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund and WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund, with each fund's weight and the weight they share.
StockJM ELSS - Tax Saver FundWhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund
ICICI Bank Limited2.88%8.53%2.88%
HDFC Bank Limited2.85%3.83%2.85%
Bharti Airtel Limited2.44%3.88%2.44%
Reliance Industries Limited2.79%2.42%2.42%
State Bank of India2.18%2.62%2.18%
Eternal Limited2.09%2.78%2.09%
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited2.08%2.49%2.08%
Coforge Limited2.31%2.04%2.04%
Maruti Suzuki India Limited1.58%1.62%1.58%
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited1.57%2.58%1.57%
PERSISTENT SYSTEMS LTD1.60%1.29%1.29%
Hindalco Industries Limited1.25%1.07%1.07%
Max Financial Services Limited1.70%1.05%1.05%
Navin Fluorine International Limited1.70%0.87%0.87%
Tech Mahindra Limited1.58%0.76%0.76%

9 more stocks in common. 24 shared of 54 / 141 positions. Weights are shown as a share of each fund's equity book.

JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund, WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the ELSS median.
Metric
JM Financial · Direct
NAV ₹57.86
Very High risk
★★★☆☆
WhiteOak Capital · Direct
NAV ₹18.32
Very High risk
★★★★★
Category median
ELSS · 50 funds
+2.38%Best in row-0.01%-3.45%
+14.78%Best in row+14.47%+9.81%
+12.41%—+9.99%
+15.29%—+12.56%
+16.32%+16.27%+14.10%
+13.23%Best in row+11.43%—
+17.96%+19.57%Best in row+17.00%
+17.36%—+17.07%
+17.58%—+15.33%
Risk
16.24%14.32%Best in row14.41%
0.510.560.23
0.680.76Best in row0.31
-37.39%-16.36%-36.01%
+5.54%Best in row+5.18%+0.95%
1.020.940.97
118.5%Best in row112.5%100.1%
95.3%88.9%Best in row95.0%
1.34%0.86%Best in row1.07%
₹243.19Cr₹494.27Cr₹859.27Cr
₹1.00K₹500—
59%37%39%
Ruchi FozdarDheeresh Pathak · 2.5y—
02 Jan 201317 Oct 2022—
54141—
26.7%34.5%—
1.3%1.5%—
4 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Nifty 500 TRI
Exit load
None
Lock-in
3 years
Min lumpsum
₹500

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund or WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund?

Over the last 3 years, JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund returned +14.78% CAGR against WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund's +14.47%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund or WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund?

WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund has the lower expense ratio: JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund charges 1.34% a year against WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund's 0.86%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund or WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund?

JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund has shown higher volatility (+16.24% annualized vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund's +14.32%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund -20.85% vs WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund -16.36%.

Which fund manages more money — JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund or WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund?

WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund is the larger fund: JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund manages ₹243.19Cr against WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund's ₹494.27Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are JM ELSS - Tax Saver Fund and WhiteOak Capital ELSS Tax Saver Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are ELSS schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.