ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund (Direct) and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Aggressive Hybrid Fund schemes — see the best aggressive hybrid mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 07 Jan 2013 – 25 Aug 2026, limited by Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.
View as table
| Date | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Nifty 50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07 Jan 2013 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 26 Feb 2014 | ₹110.82 | ₹101.14 | ₹104.18 |
| 17 Apr 2015 | ₹166.33 | ₹161.54 | ₹143.71 |
| 05 Jun 2016 | ₹169.43 | ₹170.51 | ₹137.28 |
| 24 Jul 2017 | ₹225.39 | ₹197.01 | ₹166.43 |
| 12 Sep 2018 | ₹245.75 | ₹210.56 | ₹189.87 |
| 01 Nov 2019 | ₹259.55 | ₹229.89 | ₹198.56 |
| 20 Dec 2020 | ₹291.31 | ₹300.81 | ₹229.79 |
| 08 Feb 2022 | ₹430.76 | ₹451.64 | ₹288.34 |
| 30 Mar 2023 | ₹455.29 | ₹474.65 | ₹285.23 |
| 17 May 2024 | ₹669.82 | ₹694.14 | ₹375.16 |
| 06 Jul 2025 | ₹770.14 | ₹733.55 | ₹425.17 |
| 25 Aug 2026 | ₹805.94 | ₹813.93 | ₹406.36 |
Portfolio overlap (same stocks held through more than one fund)
Some overlap is structural: SEBI defines large cap as the top 100 stocks by market capitalisation, so two large-cap funds are fishing the same pond by regulation. The bands below are measured per sleeve pairing rather than against one blanket threshold. How this is measured →
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund share 12% of their equity book by weight.
Shared holdings — ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund
| Stock | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Ltd | 6.75% | 13.31% | 6.75% |
| Larsen & Toubro Ltd | 2.23% | 5.85% | 2.23% |
| Bharti Airtel Ltd | 2.29% | 1.45% | 1.45% |
| Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd | 1.24% | 5.37% | 1.24% |
| Tech Mahindra Ltd | 0.60% | 11.17% | 0.60% |
5 shared of 122 / 11 positions. Weights are shown as a share of each fund's equity book.
| Metric | ICICI Prudential · Direct NAV ₹457.45 High risk ★★★★★ | quant · Direct NAV ₹516.85 High risk ★★★★☆ | Category median Aggressive Hybrid Fund · 30 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +3.64% | +13.16%Best in row | +4.12% | |
| +16.49%Best in row | +14.29% | +11.09% | |
| +15.61% | +16.44%Best in row | +12.22% | |
| +16.55% | +16.63% | +12.97% | |
| +13.97%Best in row | +13.56% | — | |
| +17.55% | +17.96%Best in row | +14.37% | |
| +16.98% | +18.11%Best in row | +14.04% | |
| +17.20% | +17.62%Best in row | +13.80% | |
| Risk | |||
| 9.92%Best in row | 13.04% | 10.62% | |
| 0.88Best in row | 0.67 | 0.57 | |
| 1.23Best in row | 0.94 | 0.78 | |
| -30.70% | -28.69%Best in row | -28.65% | |
| +6.62%Best in row | +6.49% | +4.12% | |
| 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.80 | |
| 96.4% | 104.2%Best in row | 92.5% | |
| 48.9%Best in row | 62.5% | 59.4% | |
| 1.05%Best in row | 1.38% | 0.99% | |
| ₹52,433Cr | ₹2,054Cr | ₹2,139Cr | |
| Up to 1.00% | 1.00% | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹1.00K | — | |
| 62% | 0% | 55% | |
| Manish Banthia · 12.9y | Sanjeev Sharma | — | |
| 02 Jan 2013 | 07 Jan 2013 | — | |
| 122 | 11 | — | |
| 35.3% | 67.8% | — | |
| 2.5% | 0.5% | — | |
4 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- 3Y return (CAGR)
- +15.25%
- Benchmark
- Nifty 50
- Lock-in
- None
- Min lumpsum
- ₹5.00K
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund returned +15.25% CAGR against ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's +15.25%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund +16.49% vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund +14.29% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund charges 1.05% a year against Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 1.38%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown higher volatility (+13.04% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's +9.92%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund -11.18% vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund -18.59%.
Which fund manages more money — ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund is the larger fund: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund manages ₹52,433Cr against Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund's ₹2,054Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Aggressive Hybrid Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.