Skip to content
WealthTicker

HDFC Gold ETF vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF

HDFC Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 27 Aug 2026

HDFC Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 26 Aug 201027 Aug 2026, limited by ICICI Prudential Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold history starts 25 Jul 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateHDFC Gold ETFICICI Prudential Gold ETF
26 Aug 2010₹100.00₹100.00
26 Dec 2011₹143.13₹99.64
26 Apr 2013₹138.34₹154.45
26 Aug 2014₹139.88₹134.63
26 Dec 2015₹125.57₹134.63
26 Apr 2017₹141.40₹134.63
27 Aug 2018₹143.04₹141.15
27 Dec 2019₹184.64₹183.46
27 Apr 2021₹222.37₹219.56
27 Aug 2022₹241.92₹239.14
27 Dec 2023₹290.56₹287.31
27 Apr 2025₹433.14₹429.01
27 Aug 2026₹706.56₹700.72
HDFC Gold ETF, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
HDFC
NAV ₹134.03
Moderately High risk
★★☆☆☆ CAT
ICICI Prudential
NAV ₹134.32
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
+55.10%+55.26%Best in row
+37.59%+37.69%
+26.04%+26.15%Best in row
+16.30%
+13.08%Best in row+12.94%
+33.19%+33.34%Best in row
+9.65%+16.60%Best in row
+8.88%+14.64%Best in row
+8.85%Best in row+7.37%
Risk
19.47%19.17%Best in row
1.601.63
2.292.34Best in row
-29.59%-22.22%Best in row
-1.63%-1.44%Best in row
97.8%97.9%
98.7%98.9%
0.60%0.49%Best in row
₹23,426Cr₹26,432Cr
₹1.18L
Bhagyesh KagalkarAshwini Bharucha
16 Aug 201026 Aug 2010
9 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Beta
1.03
Exit load
Lock-in
Min SIP
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — HDFC Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, ICICI Prudential Gold ETF returned +37.69% CAGR against HDFC Gold ETF's +37.59%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: HDFC Gold ETF +26.04% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF +26.15% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — HDFC Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: HDFC Gold ETF charges 0.60% a year against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's 0.49%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — HDFC Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

HDFC Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.47% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's +19.17%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: HDFC Gold ETF -22.27% vs ICICI Prudential Gold ETF -22.22%.

Which fund manages more money — HDFC Gold ETF or ICICI Prudential Gold ETF?

ICICI Prudential Gold ETF is the larger fund: HDFC Gold ETF manages ₹23,426Cr against ICICI Prudential Gold ETF's ₹26,432Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are HDFC Gold ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.