HDFC Gold ETF vs Axis Gold ETF
HDFC Gold ETF and Axis Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 16 Oct 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 16 Nov 2010 – 16 Oct 2026, limited by Axis Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold (ETF NAV) history starts 07 Nov 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.
View as table
| Date | HDFC Gold ETF | Axis Gold ETF |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Nov 2010 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 14 Mar 2012 | ₹133.09 | ₹132.83 |
| 12 Jul 2013 | ₹128.18 | ₹127.86 |
| 08 Nov 2014 | ₹119.77 | ₹119.34 |
| 07 Mar 2016 | ₹142.14 | ₹141.92 |
| 04 Jul 2017 | ₹130.51 | ₹125.33 |
| 01 Nov 2018 | ₹145.94 | ₹140.61 |
| 28 Feb 2020 | ₹191.15 | ₹186.03 |
| 26 Jun 2021 | ₹210.26 | ₹204.33 |
| 24 Oct 2022 | ₹219.71 | ₹214.05 |
| 20 Feb 2024 | ₹270.04 | ₹262.75 |
| 19 Jun 2025 | ₹424.53 | ₹413.92 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | ₹617.94 | ₹601.70 |
| Metric | HDFC NAV ₹123.99 Moderately High risk Unrated | Axis NAV ₹120.90 Moderately High risk ★★★☆☆ |
|---|---|---|
| +14.15%Best in row | +13.99% | |
| +33.97% | +34.05% | |
| +23.71% | +23.76% | |
| +16.07%Best in row | +15.78% | |
| +12.42% | +11.94% | |
| +28.43% | +28.45% | |
| +9.98%Best in row | +9.73% | |
| +9.14%Best in row | +8.99% | |
| +9.09%Best in row | +8.81% | |
| Risk | ||
| 19.69% | 19.35%Best in row | |
| 1.40 | 1.42 | |
| 1.99 | 2.02 | |
| -29.59% | -29.57% | |
| +0.26% | +0.23% | |
| 100.2% | 100.3% | |
| 99.2% | 99.5% | |
| 0.59% | 0.52%Best in row | |
| ₹23,492Cr | ₹5,471Cr | |
| None | — | |
| Bhagyesh Kagalkar · 4.7y | Aditya Pagaria | |
| 13 Aug 2010 | 16 Nov 2010 | |
| 1.5% | 2.0% | |
8 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- Benchmark
- Gold (ETF NAV)
- Beta
- 1.00
- Lock-in
- —
- Min SIP
- —
- Min lumpsum
- —
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — HDFC Gold ETF or Axis Gold ETF?
Over the last 3 years, Axis Gold ETF returned +34.05% CAGR against HDFC Gold ETF's +33.97%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: HDFC Gold ETF +23.71% vs Axis Gold ETF +23.76% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — HDFC Gold ETF or Axis Gold ETF?
Axis Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: HDFC Gold ETF charges 0.59% a year against Axis Gold ETF's 0.52%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — HDFC Gold ETF or Axis Gold ETF?
HDFC Gold ETF has shown higher volatility (+19.69% annualized vs Axis Gold ETF's +19.35%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: HDFC Gold ETF -22.27% vs Axis Gold ETF -22.25%.
Which fund manages more money — HDFC Gold ETF or Axis Gold ETF?
HDFC Gold ETF is the larger fund: HDFC Gold ETF manages ₹23,492Cr against Axis Gold ETF's ₹5,471Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are HDFC Gold ETF and Axis Gold ETF in the same category?
Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.