Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund vs Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund
Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) and Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Corporate Bond Fund schemes — see the best corporate bond mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 09 Oct 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 02 Jan 2013 – 09 Oct 2026, limited by Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund | Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 02 Jan 2013 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 25 Feb 2014 | ₹109.50 | ₹110.01 |
| 20 Apr 2015 | ₹127.33 | ₹122.62 |
| 12 Jun 2016 | ₹138.24 | ₹135.27 |
| 05 Aug 2017 | ₹156.92 | ₹149.56 |
| 28 Sep 2018 | ₹166.58 | ₹159.89 |
| 21 Nov 2019 | ₹189.12 | ₹175.84 |
| 13 Jan 2021 | ₹208.55 | ₹195.10 |
| 08 Mar 2022 | ₹218.61 | ₹206.51 |
| 01 May 2023 | ₹231.34 | ₹220.68 |
| 23 Jun 2024 | ₹250.23 | ₹240.01 |
| 16 Aug 2025 | ₹279.92 | ₹266.43 |
| 09 Oct 2026 | ₹299.33 | ₹281.71 |
| Metric | Franklin Templeton · Direct NAV ₹116.55 Low to Moderate risk ★★★★★ | Nippon India · Direct NAV ₹67.27 Low to Moderate risk ★★★★☆ | Category median Corporate Bond Fund · 21 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +5.80%Best in row | +4.68% | +4.47% | |
| +8.00%Best in row | +7.55% | +7.24% | |
| +6.77% | +6.76% | +6.24% | |
| +7.52%Best in row | +7.22% | +7.13% | |
| +8.29% | +7.81% | +7.26% | |
| +7.50%Best in row | +7.04% | — | |
| +8.13%Best in row | +7.82% | +7.47% | |
| +7.97%Best in row | +7.67% | +7.17% | |
| +8.05%Best in row | +7.74% | +7.74% | |
| Risk | |||
| 1.21% | 1.14% | 1.12% | |
| 1.23Best in row | 0.92 | 0.67 | |
| 2.41Best in row | 1.38 | 0.99 | |
| -7.36% | -1.70% | -2.90% | |
| 0.26%Best in row | 0.37% | 0.34% | |
| — | ₹9,244Cr | ₹4,409Cr | |
| ₹500 | ₹100 | — | |
| ₹10.00K | ₹1.00K | — | |
| Rahul Goswami · 3y | Vivek Sharma · 6.7y | — | |
| 01 Jan 2013 | 02 Jan 2013 | — | |
| 8.7% | 10.3% | — | |
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Exit load
- None
- Lock-in
- None
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund returned +8.00% CAGR against Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund's +7.55%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund +6.77% vs Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund +6.76% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund?
Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund has the lower expense ratio: Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund charges 0.26% a year against Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund's 0.37%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund?
Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund has shown higher volatility (+1.21% annualized vs Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund's +1.14%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund -0.59% vs Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund -0.61%.
Are Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund and Nippon India Corporate Bond Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Corporate Bond Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.