Skip to content
WealthTicker

Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund vs Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund

Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) and Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Corporate Bond Fund schemes — see the best corporate bond mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

Franklin India Corporate Bond FundDirectBaroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 14 Mar 202224 Aug 2026, limited by Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateFranklin India Corporate Bond FundBaroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund
14 Mar 2022₹100.00₹100.00
27 Jul 2022₹100.73₹99.42
10 Dec 2022₹102.72₹101.37
24 Apr 2023₹105.67₹104.46
06 Sep 2023₹108.16₹107.06
20 Jan 2024₹110.83₹109.49
03 Jun 2024₹114.01₹113.17
16 Oct 2024₹117.75₹117.31
01 Mar 2025₹120.73₹120.06
14 Jul 2025₹127.60₹125.74
26 Nov 2025₹130.53₹128.72
11 Apr 2026₹132.83₹130.24
24 Aug 2026₹136.15₹133.90
Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Corporate Bond Fund median.
Metric
Franklin Templeton · Direct
NAV ₹115.98
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
Baroda BNP Paribas · Direct
NAV ₹31.34
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
Category median
Corporate Bond Fund · 21 funds
+6.33%+6.37%+5.57%
+8.07%Best in row+7.86%+7.39%
+6.76%+6.34%
+7.67%+7.35%
+8.33%Best in row+6.79%+7.34%
+7.63%+7.58%
+8.12%Best in row+7.88%+7.46%
+7.99%+7.18%
+8.06%+7.75%
Risk
1.21%1.13%1.14%
1.29Best in row1.200.82
2.55Best in row1.791.21
-7.36%-2.33%Best in row-2.90%
0.26%0.21%Best in row0.34%
₹253.07Cr₹5,205Cr
₹10.00K₹5.00K
Rahul Goswami · 2.9yVikram Pamnani · 2.1y
01 Jan 201314 Mar 2022
18.2%1.7%
11 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹500
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund returned +8.07% CAGR against Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund's +7.86%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund?

Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund has the lower expense ratio: Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund charges 0.26% a year against Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund's 0.21%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund?

Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund has shown higher volatility (+1.21% annualized vs Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund's +1.13%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund -0.59% vs Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund -0.59%.

Are Franklin India Corporate Bond Fund and Baroda BNP Paribas Corporate Bond Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Corporate Bond Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.