Skip to content
WealthTicker

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund (Direct) and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Mid Cap Fund schemes — see the best mid cap mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 08 Oct 2026

Edelweiss Mid Cap FundDirectWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 08 Sep 2022 – 08 Oct 2026, limited by WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateEdelweiss Mid Cap FundWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap FundNifty Midcap 150 TRI
08 Sep 2022₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
10 Jan 2023₹96.53₹100.05₹98.89
15 May 2023₹101.51₹103.52₹102.36
16 Sep 2023₹119.92₹128.27₹127.52
18 Jan 2024₹138.61₹146.90₹146.31
21 May 2024₹159.01₹163.25₹163.59
23 Sep 2024₹195.76₹196.54₹189.41
25 Jan 2025₹177.32₹179.00₹166.90
29 May 2025₹188.33₹191.26₹179.72
30 Sep 2025₹190.66₹198.46₹179.16
02 Feb 2026₹194.37₹200.05₹181.46
06 Jun 2026₹202.79₹216.98₹190.51
08 Oct 2026₹198.59₹219.79₹182.86

Portfolio overlap (same stocks held through more than one fund)

Some overlap is structural: SEBI defines large cap as the top 100 stocks by market capitalisation, so two large-cap funds are fishing the same pond by regulation. The bands below are measured per sleeve pairing rather than against one blanket threshold. How this is measured →

579135.2%40 in both
  • 57 stocks only in Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund
  • 40 stocks in both — 35.2% of each portfolio by weight
  • 91 stocks only in WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund

The more the circles overlap, the more the funds hold the same stocks.

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund share 35% of their equity book by weight.

Shared holdings — Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund

Stocks held by both Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund, with each fund's weight and the weight they share.
StockEdelweiss Mid Cap FundWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
The Federal Bank Ltd.3.91%3.04%3.04%
Coforge Ltd.2.29%3.33%2.29%
Fortis Healthcare Ltd.2.00%2.14%2.00%
Marico Ltd.2.04%1.74%1.74%
IPCA Laboratories Ltd.1.91%1.57%1.57%
The Phoenix Mills Ltd.1.44%2.21%1.44%
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.1.42%2.16%1.42%
PB Fintech Ltd.1.32%3.01%1.32%
Max Financial Services Ltd.1.22%3.56%1.22%
Max Healthcare Institute Ltd.1.31%1.21%1.21%
Persistent Systems Ltd.2.14%1.17%1.17%
Ajanta Pharma Ltd.1.10%1.28%1.10%
Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd.2.82%1.09%1.09%
Jindal Stainless Ltd.1.12%1.03%1.03%
Vishal Mega Mart Ltd0.91%2.21%0.91%

25 more stocks in common. 40 shared of 97 / 131 positions. Weights are shown as a share of each fund's equity book.

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Mid Cap Fund median.
Metric
Edelweiss · Direct
NAV ₹120.47
Very High risk
★★★★★
WhiteOak Capital · Direct
NAV ₹22.15
Very High risk
★★★★★
Category median
Mid Cap Fund · 34 funds
+1.88%+8.28%Best in row+2.22%
+18.79%+19.74%Best in row+15.03%
+16.14%—+13.51%
+19.35%+21.28%+17.51%
+16.32%+18.07%Best in row—
+22.68%+25.45%Best in row+20.11%
+23.49%—+19.00%
Risk
16.70%16.02%Best in row16.23%
0.740.83Best in row0.54
1.001.13Best in row0.73
-39.21%-19.33%-32.95%
+5.01%+6.12%Best in row+2.15%
0.960.910.95
106.9%107.4%98.6%
87.0%83.7%Best in row89.7%
0.68%Best in row0.92%0.94%
₹19,084Cr₹7,096Cr₹7,559Cr
Up to 1.00%None—
₹100₹500—
37%240%63%
Trideep Bhattacharya · 5yDheeresh Pathak · 2.5y—
28 Nov 201608 Sep 2022—
98131—
22.3%23.7%—
4.7%6.2%—
5 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
10Y return (CAGR)
—
10Y rolling avg
—
Benchmark
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹100

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?

Over the last 3 years, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund returned +19.74% CAGR against Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund's +18.79%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund charges 0.68% a year against WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund's 0.92%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund has shown higher volatility (+16.70% annualized vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund's +16.02%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund -20.06% vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund -19.33%.

Which fund manages more money — Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund is the larger fund: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund manages ₹19,084Cr against WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund's ₹7,096Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Mid Cap Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.