Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund (Direct) and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Aggressive Hybrid Fund schemes — see the best aggressive hybrid mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 21 Oct 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 08 Jan 2013 – 21 Oct 2026, limited by Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.
View as table
| Date | Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Nifty 50 TRI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08 Jan 2013 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 04 Mar 2014 | ₹105.10 | ₹102.93 | ₹106.71 |
| 27 Apr 2015 | ₹145.60 | ₹157.29 | ₹141.26 |
| 20 Jun 2016 | ₹153.79 | ₹170.24 | ₹144.08 |
| 13 Aug 2017 | ₹178.05 | ₹192.20 | ₹172.24 |
| 07 Oct 2018 | ₹186.55 | ₹197.73 | ₹185.39 |
| 30 Nov 2019 | ₹215.07 | ₹229.69 | ₹219.80 |
| 23 Jan 2021 | ₹254.17 | ₹321.47 | ₹266.28 |
| 18 Mar 2022 | ₹321.41 | ₹445.02 | ₹324.44 |
| 12 May 2023 | ₹358.96 | ₹497.74 | ₹349.05 |
| 04 Jul 2024 | ₹524.03 | ₹733.46 | ₹470.15 |
| 28 Aug 2025 | ₹558.19 | ₹710.87 | ₹481.02 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | ₹565.46 | ₹762.35 | ₹453.07 |
Portfolio overlap (same stocks held through more than one fund)
Some overlap is structural: SEBI defines large cap as the top 100 stocks by market capitalisation, so two large-cap funds are fishing the same pond by regulation. The bands below are measured per sleeve pairing rather than against one blanket threshold. How this is measured →
- 89 stocks only in Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund
- 4 stocks in both — 7.2% of each portfolio by weight
- 7 stocks only in Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund
The more the circles overlap, the more the funds hold the same stocks.
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund share 7% of their equity book by weight.
Shared holdings — Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund
| Stock | Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reliance Industries Ltd. | 3.69% | 6.69% | 3.69% |
| Infosys Ltd. | 2.32% | 3.56% | 2.32% |
| Divi's Laboratories Ltd. | 0.65% | 11.48% | 0.65% |
| Zydus Lifesciences Ltd. | 0.49% | 14.15% | 0.49% |
4 shared of 93 / 11 positions. Weights are shown as a share of each fund's equity book.
| Metric | Edelweiss · Direct NAV ₹73.17 High risk ★★★★★ | quant · Direct NAV ₹483.48 High risk ★★★☆☆ | Category median Aggressive Hybrid Fund · 29 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| -2.84% | +0.79%Best in row | -3.41% | |
| +11.97% | +12.27%Best in row | +10.05% | |
| +12.12%Best in row | +11.09% | +8.54% | |
| +12.99% | +15.51%Best in row | +11.43% | |
| +13.39% | +15.87% | +12.01% | |
| +10.77%Best in row | +9.95% | — | |
| +14.74% | +17.86%Best in row | +14.27% | |
| +14.38% | +18.01%Best in row | +14.06% | |
| +14.42% | +17.53%Best in row | +13.79% | |
| Risk | |||
| 10.73%Best in row | 13.07% | 10.71% | |
| 0.51Best in row | 0.44 | 0.34 | |
| 0.69Best in row | 0.61 | 0.46 | |
| -28.60% | -28.69% | -28.60% | |
| +5.42% | +6.25%Best in row | +3.65% | |
| 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.80 | |
| 98.6% | 111.2%Best in row | 92.4% | |
| 62.9%Best in row | 76.8% | 67.1% | |
| 0.69%Best in row | 1.43% | 1.08% | |
| ₹3,918Cr | ₹2,165Cr | ₹2,425Cr | |
| Up to 1.00% | 1.00% | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹1.00K | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹5.00K | — | |
| 119% | 338% | 83% | |
| Bhavesh Jain · 11y | Sanjeev Sharma · 7.1y | — | |
| 12 Aug 2009 | 04 Apr 2001 | — | |
| 93 | 11 | — | |
| 25.6% | 66.4% | — | |
| 7.6% | 8.5% | — | |
2 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- Benchmark
- Nifty 50 TRI
- Lock-in
- None
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund returned +12.27% CAGR against Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund's +11.97%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund +12.12% vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund +11.09% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio: Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund charges 0.69% a year against Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 1.43%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund has shown higher volatility (+13.07% annualized vs Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund's +10.73%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund -12.02% vs Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund -18.59%.
Which fund manages more money — Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund is the larger fund: Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund manages ₹3,918Cr against Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund's ₹2,165Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Aggressive Hybrid Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.