Skip to content
WealthTicker

DSP Gold ETF vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund

DSP Gold ETF and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 22 Oct 2026

DSP Gold ETFLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 31 Jul 2023 – 22 Oct 2026, limited by LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateDSP Gold ETFLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded FundGold (ETF NAV)
31 Jul 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
06 Nov 2023₹102.46₹102.80₹102.32
13 Feb 2024₹104.55₹104.49₹104.34
21 May 2024₹123.65₹124.35₹123.59
27 Aug 2024₹119.41₹119.86₹119.20
03 Dec 2024₹126.75₹127.60₹126.52
12 Mar 2025₹142.35₹143.27₹142.12
18 Jun 2025₹163.53₹164.52₹163.23
24 Sep 2025₹186.37₹187.94₹185.98
31 Dec 2025₹217.63₹217.08₹217.07
09 Apr 2026₹244.37₹246.21₹243.60
16 Jul 2026₹231.32₹233.05₹230.33
22 Oct 2026₹233.23₹234.94₹231.97
DSP Gold ETF, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
DSP
NAV ₹13.81
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
LIC
NAV ₹128.11
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
Category median
Gold ETF · 11 funds
+11.83%+12.03%Best in row+11.75%
+31.71%+32.06%Best in row+31.79%
+27.12%+30.29%+27.81%
+34.89%+35.62%Best in row+17.81%
Risk
19.16%Best in row19.78%19.42%
1.321.291.30
1.88Best in row1.821.86
-22.18%-20.22%-22.13%
+0.27%+2.07%Best in row+0.29%
0.990.940.99
100.2%Best in row99.2%100.2%
99.8%93.3%Best in row99.1%
₹2,633Cr₹1,441Cr₹2,633Cr
—None—
₹5.00K——
Ravi Gehani · 3.5ySumit Bhatnagar · 0.5y—
28 Apr 202309 Nov 2011—
2.1%1.9%—
12 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
5Y return (CAGR)
—
10Y return (CAGR)
—
5Y SIP XIRR
—
5Y rolling avg
—
10Y rolling avg
—
Benchmark
Gold (ETF NAV)
Expense ratio (TER)
0.45%
Exit load
None
Min SIP
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — DSP Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

Over the last 3 years, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +32.06% CAGR against DSP Gold ETF's +31.71%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — DSP Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

DSP Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: DSP Gold ETF charges 0.45% a year against LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's 0.45%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — DSP Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.78% annualized vs DSP Gold ETF's +19.16%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: DSP Gold ETF -22.18% vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund -20.22%.

Which fund manages more money — DSP Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

DSP Gold ETF is the larger fund: DSP Gold ETF manages ₹2,633Cr against LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's ₹1,441Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are DSP Gold ETF and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.