Skip to content
WealthTicker

Bandhan Short Term Fund vs ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund

Bandhan Short Term Fund (Direct) and ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Short Duration Fund schemes — see the best short duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 09 Oct 2026

Bandhan Short Term FundDirectICICI Prudential Short Term FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 03 Jan 2013 – 09 Oct 2026, limited by Bandhan Short Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateBandhan Short Term FundICICI Prudential Short Term Fund
03 Jan 2013₹100.00₹100.00
26 Feb 2014₹109.60₹108.51
21 Apr 2015₹123.58₹124.07
13 Jun 2016₹136.01₹136.98
06 Aug 2017₹149.89₹154.84
29 Sep 2018₹158.08₹163.08
22 Nov 2019₹178.98₹183.64
13 Jan 2021₹197.96₹206.29
08 Mar 2022₹206.50₹216.16
01 May 2023₹218.35₹233.71
23 Jun 2024₹236.88₹255.49
16 Aug 2025₹261.78₹282.56
09 Oct 2026₹279.74₹301.55
Bandhan Short Term Fund, ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Short Duration Fund median.
Metric
Bandhan · Direct
NAV ₹66.00
Low to Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
ICICI Prudential · Direct
NAV ₹70.77
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
Category median
Short Duration Fund · 24 funds
+5.82%Best in row+5.57%+4.96%
+7.85%+7.77%+7.48%
+6.52%+7.10%Best in row+6.44%
+7.10%+7.68%Best in row+6.97%
+7.76%+8.36%+7.35%
+7.21%+7.42%Best in row—
+7.66%+8.42%Best in row+7.47%
+7.50%+8.27%Best in row+7.30%
+7.56%+8.35%Best in row+7.56%
Risk
1.01%0.93%0.95%
1.331.360.96
2.092.071.58
-2.55%-3.38%-2.45%
0.39%Best in row0.45%0.37%
₹9,041Cr₹19,244Cr₹657.71Cr
₹100₹500—
₹1.00K₹500—
Suyash Choudhary · 15.6yManish Banthia—
03 Jan 201302 Jan 2013—
12.9%3.5%—
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
—
Alpha
—
Beta
—
Upside capture
—
Downside capture
—
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Bandhan Short Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Bandhan Short Term Fund returned +7.85% CAGR against ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund's +7.77%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Bandhan Short Term Fund +6.52% vs ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund +7.10% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Bandhan Short Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund?

Bandhan Short Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: Bandhan Short Term Fund charges 0.39% a year against ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund's 0.45%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Bandhan Short Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund?

Bandhan Short Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+1.01% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund's +0.93%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Bandhan Short Term Fund -0.57% vs ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund -0.52%.

Which fund manages more money — Bandhan Short Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund?

ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund is the larger fund: Bandhan Short Term Fund manages ₹9,041Cr against ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund's ₹19,244Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Bandhan Short Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Short Term Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Short Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.