Skip to content
WealthTicker

Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund vs 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund

Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) and 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Dynamic Bond schemes — see the best dynamic bond mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 29 Oct 2026

Bandhan Dynamic Term FundDirect360 ONE Dynamic Term FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 25 Jun 2013 – 29 Oct 2026, limited by 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateBandhan Dynamic Term Fund360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund
25 Jun 2013₹100.00₹100.00
05 Aug 2014₹104.18₹103.07
15 Sep 2015₹121.23₹117.11
26 Oct 2016₹137.45₹128.41
06 Dec 2017₹148.66₹140.11
16 Jan 2019₹157.35₹149.09
26 Feb 2020₹182.24₹163.91
07 Apr 2021₹199.07₹176.21
18 May 2022₹202.93₹186.01
29 Jun 2023₹219.73₹200.01
08 Aug 2024₹243.68₹219.37
18 Sep 2025₹257.48₹241.67
29 Oct 2026₹276.98₹252.63
Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund, 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Dynamic Bond median.
Metric
Bandhan · Direct
NAV ₹40.34
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
360 One · Direct
NAV ₹25.27
Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Dynamic Bond · 22 funds
+6.65%Best in row+3.32%+2.81%
+7.98%Best in row+7.71%+6.74%
+6.21%+6.55%Best in row+6.02%
+7.26%Best in row+7.00%+6.64%
+8.15%+7.19%+7.34%
+6.85%Best in row+6.71%—
+8.26%Best in row+7.59%+7.43%
+8.05%Best in row+7.39%+7.26%
+8.16%Best in row+7.52%+7.62%
Risk
3.32%1.73%Best in row2.05%
0.440.70Best in row0.11
0.640.99Best in row0.15
-6.96%-8.03%-4.32%
0.79%0.34%Best in row0.52%
₹671.31Cr₹565.45Cr₹264.34Cr
₹100₹1.00K—
₹1.00K₹10.00K—
Suyash Choudhary · 16yMilan Mody · 5.7y—
25 Jun 200224 Jun 2013—
60.3%7.0%—
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
—
Alpha
—
Beta
—
Upside capture
—
Downside capture
—
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund or 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund returned +7.98% CAGR against 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund's +7.71%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund +6.21% vs 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund +6.55% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund or 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund?

360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund charges 0.79% a year against 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund's 0.34%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund or 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund?

Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+3.32% annualized vs 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund's +1.73%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund -4.06% vs 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund -2.13%.

Which fund manages more money — Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund or 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund?

Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund is the larger fund: Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund manages ₹671.31Cr against 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund's ₹565.45Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Bandhan Dynamic Term Fund and 360 ONE Dynamic Term Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Dynamic Bond schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.