Axis Liquid Fund vs Edelweiss Liquid Fund
Axis Liquid Fund (Direct) and Edelweiss Liquid Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Liquid Fund schemes — see the best liquid mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 27 Nov 2016 – 20 Aug 2026, limited by Edelweiss Liquid Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Axis Liquid Fund | Edelweiss Liquid Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2016 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 19 Sep 2017 | ₹105.49 | ₹105.40 |
| 12 Jul 2018 | ₹111.57 | ₹111.47 |
| 04 May 2019 | ₹118.37 | ₹118.31 |
| 24 Feb 2020 | ₹124.21 | ₹124.24 |
| 16 Dec 2020 | ₹128.42 | ₹128.51 |
| 09 Oct 2021 | ₹131.85 | ₹132.11 |
| 01 Aug 2022 | ₹136.03 | ₹136.23 |
| 24 May 2023 | ₹143.36 | ₹143.56 |
| 15 Mar 2024 | ₹151.70 | ₹151.95 |
| 05 Jan 2025 | ₹160.76 | ₹161.09 |
| 28 Oct 2025 | ₹169.51 | ₹169.83 |
| 20 Aug 2026 | ₹178.61 | ₹178.88 |
| Metric | Axis · Direct NAV ₹3,148.77 Low risk ★★★★★ | Edelweiss · Direct NAV ₹3,658.21 Low risk ★★★★☆ | Category median Liquid Fund · 53 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +6.52% | +6.49% | +6.42% | |
| +6.35% | +6.34% | +6.29% | |
| +6.17% | — | +6.12% | |
| +6.87%Best in row | +6.16% | +6.42% | |
| +6.83% | +6.82% | — | |
| +6.56%Best in row | +5.84% | +6.49% | |
| +6.33%Best in row | +5.59% | +6.24% | |
| +6.46% | — | +6.42% | |
| Risk | |||
| 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.17% | |
| -0.19% | -0.15% | -0.16% | |
| 0.13% | 0.10%Best in row | 0.15% | |
| ₹55,968Cr | ₹13,834Cr | ₹5,378Cr | |
| ₹100 | ₹1.00K | — | |
| Devang Shah | Pranavi Kulkarni · 4.7y | — | |
| 01 Jan 2013 | 27 Nov 2016 | — | |
| -13.7% | -8.8% | — | |
14 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- 3Y return (CAGR)
- +7.03%
- Sharpe
- —
- Sortino
- —
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Exit load
- Up to 0.01%
- Lock-in
- None
- Min lumpsum
- ₹100
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Axis Liquid Fund or Edelweiss Liquid Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Edelweiss Liquid Fund returned +7.03% CAGR against Axis Liquid Fund's +7.03%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Axis Liquid Fund +6.35% vs Edelweiss Liquid Fund +6.34% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Axis Liquid Fund or Edelweiss Liquid Fund?
Edelweiss Liquid Fund has the lower expense ratio: Axis Liquid Fund charges 0.13% a year against Edelweiss Liquid Fund's 0.10%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Axis Liquid Fund or Edelweiss Liquid Fund?
Axis Liquid Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.17% annualized vs Edelweiss Liquid Fund's +0.15%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Axis Liquid Fund -0.01% vs Edelweiss Liquid Fund -0.01%.
Which fund manages more money — Axis Liquid Fund or Edelweiss Liquid Fund?
Axis Liquid Fund is the larger fund: Axis Liquid Fund manages ₹55,968Cr against Edelweiss Liquid Fund's ₹13,834Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are Axis Liquid Fund and Edelweiss Liquid Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Liquid Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.