Skip to content
WealthTicker

Axis Gold ETF vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund

Axis Gold ETF and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 12 Oct 2026

Axis Gold ETFLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 31 Jul 2023 – 12 Oct 2026, limited by LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateAxis Gold ETFLIC MF Gold Exchange Traded FundGold
31 Jul 2023₹100.00₹100.00₹100.00
05 Nov 2023₹102.86₹102.91₹102.25
11 Feb 2024₹104.60₹104.69₹104.72
18 May 2024₹122.23₹122.94₹122.31
24 Aug 2024₹118.87₹119.33₹118.93
29 Nov 2024₹127.40₹127.80₹126.90
07 Mar 2025₹142.50₹143.20₹142.54
12 Jun 2025₹160.33₹162.02₹160.66
17 Sep 2025₹180.45₹181.49₹180.12
24 Dec 2025₹223.71₹224.79₹223.47
31 Mar 2026₹240.31₹238.90₹239.22
07 Jul 2026₹234.78₹236.48₹234.07
12 Oct 2026₹240.88₹242.83₹239.32
Axis Gold ETF, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gold ETF median.
Metric
Axis
NAV ₹122.36
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
LIC
NAV ₹132.41
Moderately High risk
★★★★★
Category median
Gold ETF · 25 funds
+20.85%+21.46%Best in row+21.01%
+35.30%+35.67%Best in row+35.24%
+24.54%—+24.54%
+15.86%—+16.12%
+12.03%+31.94%+21.76%
+29.07%+33.92%Best in row—
+9.62%+36.02%Best in row+12.36%
+8.96%—+9.61%
+8.75%—+8.85%
Risk
19.37%Best in row19.77%19.77%
1.491.481.48
2.122.082.11
-29.57%-20.22%-22.15%
-1.15%+0.01%Best in row-1.27%
1.061.031.06
100.3%103.1%Best in row100.0%
98.6%Best in row106.3%98.2%
0.52%0.45%Best in row0.50%
₹5,471Cr₹1,441Cr₹1,709Cr
—None—
—None—
Aditya PagariaSumit Bhatnagar · 0.5y—
16 Nov 201031 Jul 2023—
2.0%1.9%—
6 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Min SIP
—
Min lumpsum
—
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Axis Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

Over the last 3 years, LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +35.67% CAGR against Axis Gold ETF's +35.30%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Axis Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund has the lower expense ratio: Axis Gold ETF charges 0.52% a year against LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's 0.45%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Axis Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.77% annualized vs Axis Gold ETF's +19.37%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Axis Gold ETF -22.25% vs LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund -20.22%.

Which fund manages more money — Axis Gold ETF or LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund?

Axis Gold ETF is the larger fund: Axis Gold ETF manages ₹5,471Cr against LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund's ₹1,441Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Axis Gold ETF and LIC MF Gold Exchange Traded Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.