Skip to content
WealthTicker

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund (Direct) and Tata Ultra Short Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Ultra Short Duration Fund schemes — see the best ultra short duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 31 Aug 2026

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term FundDirectTata Ultra Short Term FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 23 Jan 201931 Aug 2026, limited by Tata Ultra Short Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateAditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term FundTata Ultra Short Term Fund
23 Jan 2019₹100.00₹100.00
11 Sep 2019₹105.72₹105.17
30 Apr 2020₹109.87₹109.48
17 Dec 2020₹115.48₹113.16
06 Aug 2021₹118.57₹115.94
25 Mar 2022₹121.62₹118.90
12 Nov 2022₹125.17₹122.41
01 Jul 2023₹130.98₹128.12
17 Feb 2024₹136.97₹134.02
06 Oct 2024₹143.87₹140.62
25 May 2025₹151.58₹147.86
12 Jan 2026₹157.97₹154.05
31 Aug 2026₹164.67₹161.10
Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund, Tata Ultra Short Term Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Ultra Short Duration Fund median.
Metric
Aditya Birla Sun Life · Direct
NAV ₹602.32
Low risk
★★★★☆
Tata · Direct
NAV ₹16.12
Low risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Ultra Short Duration Fund · 27 funds
+6.62%+6.93%Best in row+6.52%
+7.48%+7.51%+7.24%
+6.72%+6.73%+6.53%
+7.01%+6.59%
+7.68%Best in row+6.47%+6.64%
+7.26%+7.30%
+7.47%Best in row+6.14%+6.75%
+7.29%Best in row+6.15%+6.33%
+7.40%+7.00%
Risk
0.42%0.37%0.37%
-1.21%-0.71%Best in row-0.89%
0.32%0.33%0.31%
₹5,343Cr₹2,609Cr
0.25%None
₹100₹500
₹1.00K₹5.00K
208%70%
Harshil Suvarnkar · 5.5yDhawal Joshi · 0.9y
02 Jan 201323 Jan 2019
84
37.7%
51.9%-9.7%
8 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Sharpe
Sortino
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Lock-in
None

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Tata Ultra Short Term Fund returned +7.51% CAGR against Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund's +7.48%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund +6.72% vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund +6.73% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund charges 0.32% a year against Tata Ultra Short Term Fund's 0.33%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund or Tata Ultra Short Term Fund?

Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.42% annualized vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund's +0.37%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund -0.12% vs Tata Ultra Short Term Fund -0.09%.

Are Aditya Birla Sun Life Ultra Short Term Fund and Tata Ultra Short Term Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Ultra Short Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.