Skip to content
WealthTicker

DSP Gilt Fund vs UTI - Gilt Fund

DSP Gilt Fund (Direct) and UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gilt Fund schemes — see the best gilt mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 07 Oct 2026

DSP Gilt FundDirectUTI - Gilt FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 03 Jan 2013 – 07 Oct 2026, limited by UTI - Gilt Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateDSP Gilt FundUTI - Gilt Fund
03 Jan 2013₹100.00₹100.00
26 Feb 2014₹101.47₹103.33
21 Apr 2015₹119.33₹128.00
12 Jun 2016₹128.28₹135.35
05 Aug 2017₹149.29₹163.48
28 Sep 2018₹150.47₹164.17
21 Nov 2019₹177.97₹190.46
12 Jan 2021₹203.38₹210.94
07 Mar 2022₹210.41₹215.06
30 Apr 2023₹224.84₹230.12
22 Jun 2024₹249.65₹250.66
14 Aug 2025₹269.83₹271.63
07 Oct 2026₹279.58₹284.93
DSP Gilt Fund, UTI - Gilt Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Gilt Fund median.
Metric
DSP · Direct
NAV ₹105.53
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹68.13
Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Gilt Fund · 25 funds
+2.28%+4.36%Best in row+2.10%
+7.00%Best in row+6.82%+6.43%
+5.92%Best in row+5.66%+5.58%
+7.22%Best in row+6.83%+6.74%
+7.78%+7.91%+7.41%
+6.00%+6.04%—
+8.42%Best in row+8.13%+7.90%
+8.29%Best in row+7.86%+7.79%
+8.36%Best in row+8.04%+8.04%
Risk
3.75%2.59%Best in row3.08%
0.130.12-0.03
0.180.17-0.04
-7.59%-8.10%-7.84%
0.59%0.47%Best in row0.50%
₹1,219Cr₹407.09Cr₹158.30Cr
₹100₹500—
₹100₹500—
Shantanu GodambePankaj Pathak—
02 Jan 201303 Jan 2013—
2.4%6.8%—
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
—
Alpha
—
Beta
—
Upside capture
—
Downside capture
—
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
—
Holdings
—
Top 10 weight
—

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — DSP Gilt Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?

Over the last 3 years, DSP Gilt Fund returned +7.00% CAGR against UTI - Gilt Fund's +6.82%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: DSP Gilt Fund +5.92% vs UTI - Gilt Fund +5.66% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — DSP Gilt Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?

UTI - Gilt Fund has the lower expense ratio: DSP Gilt Fund charges 0.59% a year against UTI - Gilt Fund's 0.47%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — DSP Gilt Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?

DSP Gilt Fund has shown higher volatility (+3.75% annualized vs UTI - Gilt Fund's +2.59%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: DSP Gilt Fund -4.20% vs UTI - Gilt Fund -3.24%.

Which fund manages more money — DSP Gilt Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?

DSP Gilt Fund is the larger fund: DSP Gilt Fund manages ₹1,219Cr against UTI - Gilt Fund's ₹407.09Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are DSP Gilt Fund and UTI - Gilt Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Gilt Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.