Skip to content
WealthTicker
From AMFI & SEBI filings — SIDs and SAIs

Fund Managers

Every manager named in a Scheme Information Document — the statutory “Who manages the Scheme?” disclosure — with the schemes they run. Open a row to see their funds.

Managers
456
Fund houses
48
Scheme assignments
3,633

1 of 456

Profile & funds →2
Role
Senior Fund Manager Fund
Qualifications
MBA (Finance) B.E. (Civil)
Experience
Over 25 years of experience in Equity Markets From June 15, 2021 onwards NAM India : Senior Fund Manager – Equity May 2008 – June 2021 Tata Asset Management Ltd.: Senior Fund Manager : May 2019 to June 14, 2021 Tata Asset Management Ltd.: Fund Manager : June 2013 to April 2019 Tata Asset Management Ltd.: Head PMS – Investments : January 2012 to May 2013 Tata Asset Management Ltd.: DGM – Investments : May 2008 to December 2011 August 2007 – April 2008 Indiareit Fund Advisors Pvt. Ltd. : Assistant Vice President November 2001 – August 2007 CARE : Deputy General Manager : November 2006 to August 2007 CARE : Senior Manager : April 2005 to October 2006 CARE : Manager : August 2004 to March 2005 CARE : Analyst : November 2001 to August 2004

Role and Managing since come from each scheme’s SID/SAI filing and are often not disclosed — a dash means the filing didn’t state it, not that the manager is new.

Read from each scheme’s most recent Scheme Information Document, as filed with SEBI and published by AMFI. A manager is listed once per fund house. Because that disclosure is per scheme, one person is filed many times and the filings can disagree — each field shown is taken from their most recent document, and the bio is whichever of their filings carries the least of a neighbouring column.

Two gaps that leaves are filled from a second document: each fund house’s Statement of Additional Information, which states its key personnel once, in one table, rather than once per scheme. That is where the role and the total-experience figure come from — and where that table’s own columns garbled a role, by running a neighbouring number through it or welding the page heading onto its end, it is left blank rather than published. It also supplies a qualification or a bio wherever the scheme filings left one blank or left one that could not be right. It does not overwrite a value that already reads cleanly: an SAI is filed roughly once a year, so it is often the older of the two. An expanded row says which of its fields came from there.

A manager is also listed against a scheme when another of the same house’s filings names them on it: every SID must list the other schemes its managers run, which reaches 179 live schemes whose own document we do not hold. Those entries are shown with a dashed outline, and the list for such a scheme may be incomplete — only a manager who also appears in a filing we hold can be found that way.

Coverage is limited to schemes whose SID we hold and could read, so a fund manager with no row here is one whose filing we have not parsed rather than one who does not exist — and where a qualification or an experience is still missing, it is a cell both documents’ layouts defeated rather than something the manager lacks.