Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs Quantum Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and Quantum Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectQuantum Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 27 Feb 200820 Aug 2026, limited by Quantum Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold history starts 25 Jul 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundQuantum Gold ETF
27 Feb 2008₹100.00₹100.00
11 Sep 2009₹125.85₹125.94
28 Mar 2011₹163.05₹163.00
10 Oct 2012₹242.32₹242.20
26 Apr 2014₹214.85₹214.46
09 Nov 2015₹194.48₹193.93
25 May 2017₹213.31₹212.71
08 Dec 2018₹224.90₹223.37
22 Jun 2020₹343.71₹341.13
06 Jan 2022₹336.34₹335.65
22 Jul 2023₹411.54₹410.72
04 Feb 2025₹570.30₹563.23
20 Aug 2026₹1060.45₹1049.33
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, Quantum Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹131.11
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
Quantum
NAV ₹129.09
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
+57.58%+57.66%
+38.05%Best in row+37.67%
+26.14%Best in row+25.96%
+16.06%Best in row+15.95%
+14.53%Best in row+13.57%
+33.15%Best in row+32.94%
+12.28%Best in row+11.50%
+10.42%Best in row+9.42%
+8.84%Best in row+8.58%
Risk
19.66%19.32%Best in row
1.601.61
2.292.32
-29.80%-29.70%
-1.83%Best in row-2.20%
1.091.10
102.6%Best in row100.5%
106.8%101.4%Best in row
0.59%0.55%Best in row
₹3,315Cr₹720.91Cr
Sharwan Kumar GoyalChirag Mehta
13 Apr 200727 Feb 2008
9 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Exit load
Lock-in
Min SIP
Min lumpsum
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Quantum Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +38.05% CAGR against Quantum Gold ETF's +37.67%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund +26.14% vs Quantum Gold ETF +25.96% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Quantum Gold ETF?

Quantum Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund charges 0.59% a year against Quantum Gold ETF's 0.55%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Quantum Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.66% annualized vs Quantum Gold ETF's +19.32%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs Quantum Gold ETF -22.34%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Quantum Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,315Cr against Quantum Gold ETF's ₹720.91Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and Quantum Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.