Skip to content
WealthTicker

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund vs Kotak Gold ETF

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund (Direct) and Kotak Gold ETF head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Gold ETF schemes — see the best gold etfs for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundDirectKotak Gold ETF2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 30 Jul 200725 Aug 2026, limited by Kotak Gold ETF. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window. Benchmark lines are the category index WealthTicker measures against, which is not always the benchmark the scheme itself declares — the fund page’s Scheme Info names that one. Gold history starts 25 Jul 2016, so that benchmark is not plotted over this window — pick a shorter range to see it.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateUTI - Gold Exchange Traded FundKotak Gold ETF
30 Jul 2007₹100.00₹100.00
02 Mar 2009₹179.38₹179.36
03 Oct 2010₹212.95₹212.57
06 May 2012₹320.72₹320.07
07 Dec 2013₹290.77₹289.89
11 Jul 2015₹277.25₹276.33
10 Feb 2017₹304.41₹302.11
14 Sep 2018₹313.39₹309.67
16 Apr 2020₹481.29₹475.94
18 Nov 2021₹485.82₹484.77
21 Jun 2023₹572.53₹572.11
22 Jan 2025₹778.40₹767.11
25 Aug 2026₹1536.10₹1521.02
UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund, Kotak Gold ETF compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics.
Metric
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹134.99
Moderately High risk
★★★★☆
Kotak Mahindra
NAV ₹133.85
Moderately High risk
★★★☆☆
+61.30%Best in row+59.27%
+39.14%Best in row+38.69%
+26.77%Best in row+26.59%
+16.56%+16.51%
+14.69%+15.34%Best in row
+34.45%Best in row+34.17%
+12.31%Best in row+11.98%
+10.43%Best in row+10.04%
+8.86%Best in row+8.71%
Risk
19.71%19.12%Best in row
1.661.68
2.372.42
-29.80%-29.84%
-1.77%-1.51%Best in row
1.081.06
102.3%Best in row99.5%
106.8%98.8%Best in row
0.59%0.52%Best in row
₹3,315Cr₹14,430Cr
None
₹1.15L
Sharwan Kumar GoyalAbhishek Bisen
13 Apr 200730 Jul 2007
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Gold
Lock-in
Min SIP
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight
Cash & equivalents

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Kotak Gold ETF?

Over the last 3 years, UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund returned +39.14% CAGR against Kotak Gold ETF's +38.69%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund +26.77% vs Kotak Gold ETF +26.59% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Kotak Gold ETF?

Kotak Gold ETF has the lower expense ratio: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund charges 0.59% a year against Kotak Gold ETF's 0.52%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Kotak Gold ETF?

UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund has shown higher volatility (+19.71% annualized vs Kotak Gold ETF's +19.12%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund -21.22% vs Kotak Gold ETF -22.27%.

Which fund manages more money — UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund or Kotak Gold ETF?

Kotak Gold ETF is the larger fund: UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund manages ₹3,315Cr against Kotak Gold ETF's ₹14,430Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are UTI - Gold Exchange Traded Fund and Kotak Gold ETF in the same category?

Yes — both are Gold ETF schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.