Skip to content
WealthTicker

SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund vs Bandhan Floater Fund

SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund (Direct) and Bandhan Floater Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Floater Fund schemes — see the best floater mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

SBI Floating Rate Debt FundDirectBandhan Floater FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 22 Feb 202125 Aug 2026, limited by Bandhan Floater Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateSBI Floating Rate Debt FundBandhan Floater Fund
22 Feb 2021₹100.00₹100.00
09 Aug 2021₹101.82₹102.03
23 Jan 2022₹103.54₹103.70
10 Jul 2022₹105.21₹105.11
24 Dec 2022₹107.80₹107.75
10 Jun 2023₹111.39₹111.55
24 Nov 2023₹115.51₹114.84
10 May 2024₹119.81₹118.73
24 Oct 2024₹124.67₹123.85
10 Apr 2025₹129.41₹129.42
24 Sep 2025₹133.34₹133.63
11 Mar 2026₹137.72₹137.26
25 Aug 2026₹141.75₹142.11
SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund, Bandhan Floater Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Floater Fund median.
Metric
SBI · Direct
NAV ₹14.47
Moderate risk
★☆☆☆☆
Bandhan · Direct
NAV ₹14.22
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Floater Fund · 7 funds
+6.67%+7.06%Best in row+6.67%
+7.69%+7.92%Best in row+7.69%
+6.77%+6.79%+6.77%
+6.53%+6.59%+7.23%
+7.43%+7.58%Best in row
+7.04%+7.10%+7.37%
+6.55%+6.60%+7.02%
Risk
0.92%0.98%0.77%
1.301.45Best in row1.68
2.112.25Best in row2.59
-0.58%Best in row-0.68%-1.33%
0.28%0.10%Best in row0.27%
₹683.31Cr₹228.73Cr₹3,275Cr
0.10%None
₹500₹100
₹5.00K₹1.00K
Rajeev Radhakrishnan · 5.9yBrijesh Shah
04 Nov 202022 Feb 2021
63.9%2.3%
11 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
10Y return (CAGR)
10Y rolling avg
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Bandhan Floater Fund returned +7.92% CAGR against SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund's +7.69%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund +6.77% vs Bandhan Floater Fund +6.79% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Bandhan Floater Fund has the lower expense ratio: SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund charges 0.28% a year against Bandhan Floater Fund's 0.10%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Bandhan Floater Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.98% annualized vs SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund's +0.92%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund -0.58% vs Bandhan Floater Fund -0.47%.

Which fund manages more money — SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund is the larger fund: SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund manages ₹683.31Cr against Bandhan Floater Fund's ₹228.73Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are SBI Floating Rate Debt Fund and Bandhan Floater Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Floater Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.