Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Low Duration Fund vs Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund

Kotak Low Duration Fund (Direct) and Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Low Duration Fund schemes — see the best low duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026

Kotak Low Duration FundDirectMahindra Manulife Low Duration FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 16 Feb 201720 Aug 2026, limited by Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Low Duration FundMahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund
16 Feb 2017₹100.00₹100.00
02 Dec 2017₹106.35₹105.70
18 Sep 2018₹112.49₹111.36
04 Jul 2019₹120.23₹119.37
18 Apr 2020₹128.52₹126.75
02 Feb 2021₹136.98₹133.25
18 Nov 2021₹142.28₹137.87
03 Sep 2022₹146.56₹142.07
20 Jun 2023₹154.92₹149.89
04 Apr 2024₹164.14₹158.86
18 Jan 2025₹174.33₹168.61
04 Nov 2025₹185.88₹179.51
20 Aug 2026₹195.07₹188.59
Kotak Low Duration Fund, Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Low Duration Fund median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹3,922.99
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Mahindra Manulife · Direct
NAV ₹1,887.44
Low to Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Low Duration Fund · 25 funds
+6.43%+6.48%+6.31%
+7.56%+7.52%+7.40%
+6.73%+6.64%+6.57%
+7.38%+6.80%
+7.70%Best in row+6.90%+7.19%
+7.32%+7.26%
+7.46%Best in row+6.68%+7.23%
+7.31%Best in row+6.40%+7.04%
+7.63%+7.14%
Risk
0.51%0.48%0.49%
2.081.57
3.623.00
-1.50%-0.99%Best in row-1.36%
0.40%0.35%Best in row0.35%
₹13,954Cr₹548.25Cr₹1,734Cr
₹100₹500
₹100₹1.00K
Deepak AgrawalRahul Pal · 9.5y
02 Feb 201516 Feb 2017
1.6%7.1%
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Low Duration Fund or Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Kotak Low Duration Fund returned +7.56% CAGR against Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund's +7.52%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Low Duration Fund +6.73% vs Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund +6.64% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Low Duration Fund or Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Low Duration Fund charges 0.40% a year against Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund's 0.35%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Low Duration Fund or Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund?

Kotak Low Duration Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.51% annualized vs Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund's +0.48%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Low Duration Fund -0.24% vs Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund -0.23%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Low Duration Fund or Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund?

Kotak Low Duration Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Low Duration Fund manages ₹13,954Cr against Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund's ₹548.25Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Low Duration Fund and Mahindra Manulife Low Duration Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Low Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.