Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Floating Rate Fund vs Bandhan Floater Fund

Kotak Floating Rate Fund (Direct) and Bandhan Floater Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Floater Fund schemes — see the best floater mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

Kotak Floating Rate FundDirectBandhan Floater FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 22 Feb 202125 Aug 2026, limited by Bandhan Floater Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Floating Rate FundBandhan Floater Fund
22 Feb 2021₹100.00₹100.00
09 Aug 2021₹103.78₹102.03
23 Jan 2022₹105.89₹103.70
10 Jul 2022₹106.56₹105.11
24 Dec 2022₹109.67₹107.75
10 Jun 2023₹113.43₹111.55
24 Nov 2023₹117.32₹114.84
10 May 2024₹121.48₹118.73
24 Oct 2024₹126.83₹123.85
10 Apr 2025₹131.92₹129.42
24 Sep 2025₹136.96₹133.63
11 Mar 2026₹141.05₹137.26
25 Aug 2026₹144.62₹142.11
Kotak Floating Rate Fund, Bandhan Floater Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Floater Fund median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹1,662.96
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
Bandhan · Direct
NAV ₹14.22
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Floater Fund · 9 funds
+6.08%+7.06%Best in row+6.67%
+7.81%+7.92%Best in row+7.69%
+6.75%+6.79%+6.77%
+7.23%Best in row+6.59%+7.26%
+7.45%+7.58%Best in row
+6.90%+7.10%Best in row+7.65%
+7.02%Best in row+6.60%+7.27%
Risk
0.76%Best in row0.98%0.80%
1.71Best in row1.451.45
2.72Best in row2.252.25
-2.03%-0.68%Best in row-1.33%
0.24%0.10%Best in row0.27%
₹3,275Cr₹228.73Cr₹3,275Cr
₹100₹1.00K
Deepak AgrawalBrijesh Shah
16 May 201922 Feb 2021
4.7%2.3%
13 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
10Y return (CAGR)
10Y rolling avg
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹100
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Floating Rate Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Bandhan Floater Fund returned +7.92% CAGR against Kotak Floating Rate Fund's +7.81%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Floating Rate Fund +6.75% vs Bandhan Floater Fund +6.79% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Floating Rate Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Bandhan Floater Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Floating Rate Fund charges 0.24% a year against Bandhan Floater Fund's 0.10%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Floating Rate Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Bandhan Floater Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.98% annualized vs Kotak Floating Rate Fund's +0.76%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Floating Rate Fund -0.46% vs Bandhan Floater Fund -0.47%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Floating Rate Fund or Bandhan Floater Fund?

Kotak Floating Rate Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Floating Rate Fund manages ₹3,275Cr against Bandhan Floater Fund's ₹228.73Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Floating Rate Fund and Bandhan Floater Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Floater Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.