Kotak Dynamic Term Fund vs ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund
Kotak Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Dynamic Bond schemes — see the best dynamic bond mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 03 Jan 2013 – 25 Aug 2026, limited by ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Kotak Dynamic Term Fund | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 03 Jan 2013 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 22 Feb 2014 | ₹110.53 | ₹110.88 |
| 13 Apr 2015 | ₹124.02 | ₹134.68 |
| 02 Jun 2016 | ₹137.79 | ₹147.28 |
| 22 Jul 2017 | ₹157.50 | ₹173.88 |
| 10 Sep 2018 | ₹164.64 | ₹180.31 |
| 30 Oct 2019 | ₹190.07 | ₹202.23 |
| 18 Dec 2020 | ₹215.62 | ₹231.40 |
| 06 Feb 2022 | ₹224.06 | ₹242.05 |
| 29 Mar 2023 | ₹235.32 | ₹261.65 |
| 17 May 2024 | ₹258.97 | ₹287.02 |
| 06 Jul 2025 | ₹288.53 | ₹319.95 |
| 25 Aug 2026 | ₹307.46 | ₹340.94 |
| Metric | Kotak Mahindra · Direct NAV ₹43.67 Moderate risk ★★★★☆ | ICICI Prudential · Direct NAV ₹42.72 Moderate risk ★★★★★ | Category median Dynamic Bond · 22 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +7.95%Best in row | +6.67% | +5.58% | |
| +8.07%Best in row | +7.97% | +7.23% | |
| +6.86% | +7.29%Best in row | +6.29% | |
| +7.86% | +8.15%Best in row | +6.97% | |
| +8.58% | +9.41%Best in row | +7.56% | |
| +7.51% | +7.71%Best in row | — | |
| +8.60% | +9.31%Best in row | +7.49% | |
| +8.47% | +9.05%Best in row | +7.29% | |
| +8.54% | +9.23%Best in row | +7.69% | |
| Risk | |||
| 2.45% | 1.60%Best in row | 2.06% | |
| 0.64 | 0.92Best in row | 0.35 | |
| 0.90 | 1.34Best in row | 0.50 | |
| -3.22%Best in row | -3.59% | -4.32% | |
| 0.61%Best in row | 0.63% | 0.52% | |
| ₹2,366Cr | — | ₹120.55Cr | |
| None | 0.25% | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹5.00K | — | |
| Deepak Agrawal · 13.7y | Manish Banthia · 13.7y | — | |
| 02 Jan 2013 | 03 Jan 2013 | — | |
| 2.7% | -4.1% | — | |
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Lock-in
- None
- Min SIP
- ₹100
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Dynamic Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund?
Over the last 3 years, Kotak Dynamic Term Fund returned +8.07% CAGR against ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund's +7.97%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Dynamic Term Fund +6.86% vs ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund +7.29% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Dynamic Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund?
Kotak Dynamic Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Dynamic Term Fund charges 0.61% a year against ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund's 0.63%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Kotak Dynamic Term Fund or ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund?
Kotak Dynamic Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+2.45% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund's +1.60%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Dynamic Term Fund -2.35% vs ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund -1.46%.
Are Kotak Dynamic Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Dynamic Bond schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.