Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Bond Fund vs JM Medium to Long Duration Fund

Kotak Bond Fund (Direct) and JM Medium to Long Duration Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Medium to Long Duration Fund schemes — see the best medium to long duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

Kotak Bond FundDirectJM Medium to Long Duration FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 03 Jan 201325 Aug 2026, limited by JM Medium to Long Duration Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Bond FundJM Medium to Long Duration Fund
03 Jan 2013₹100.00₹100.00
22 Feb 2014₹102.73₹106.63
13 Apr 2015₹121.12₹122.92
02 Jun 2016₹131.12₹129.17
22 Jul 2017₹148.98₹143.06
10 Sep 2018₹149.22₹146.62
30 Oct 2019₹170.87₹142.37
18 Dec 2020₹195.46₹158.42
06 Feb 2022₹201.29₹161.59
29 Mar 2023₹212.88₹168.24
17 May 2024₹233.47₹182.53
06 Jul 2025₹259.02₹203.58
25 Aug 2026₹272.82₹211.58
Kotak Bond Fund, JM Medium to Long Duration Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Medium to Long Duration Fund median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹91.13
Moderate risk
★★★★☆
JM Financial · Direct
NAV ₹72.47
Moderate risk
★★★☆☆
Category median
Medium to Long Duration Fund · 8 funds
+6.34%Best in row+4.74%+4.85%
+7.46%Best in row+6.94%+6.81%
+6.45%Best in row+5.59%+6.11%
+7.01%Best in row+4.77%+6.81%
+7.65%Best in row+5.65%+7.60%
+7.01%Best in row+6.34%
+7.87%Best in row+5.28%+7.74%
+7.68%Best in row+4.80%+7.57%
+7.81%Best in row+5.11%+7.69%
Risk
2.15%2.08%2.11%
0.45Best in row0.210.15
0.63Best in row0.300.20
-9.92%Best in row-10.57%-10.23%
0.74%0.59%Best in row0.76%
₹1,834Cr₹29.51Cr₹360.53Cr
₹100₹1.00K
Abhishek BisenJayant Dhoot
02 Jan 201303 Jan 2013
22.4%7.1%
11 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹100
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Bond Fund or JM Medium to Long Duration Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Kotak Bond Fund returned +7.46% CAGR against JM Medium to Long Duration Fund's +6.94%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Bond Fund +6.45% vs JM Medium to Long Duration Fund +5.59% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Bond Fund or JM Medium to Long Duration Fund?

JM Medium to Long Duration Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Bond Fund charges 0.74% a year against JM Medium to Long Duration Fund's 0.59%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Bond Fund or JM Medium to Long Duration Fund?

Kotak Bond Fund has shown higher volatility (+2.15% annualized vs JM Medium to Long Duration Fund's +2.08%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Bond Fund -1.78% vs JM Medium to Long Duration Fund -1.54%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Bond Fund or JM Medium to Long Duration Fund?

Kotak Bond Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Bond Fund manages ₹1,834Cr against JM Medium to Long Duration Fund's ₹29.51Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Bond Fund and JM Medium to Long Duration Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Medium to Long Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.