Kotak Bond Fund vs ICICI Prudential Bond Fund
Kotak Bond Fund (Direct) and ICICI Prudential Bond Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Medium to Long Duration Fund schemes — see the best medium to long duration mutual funds for the full ranking.
Head to head
NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026
Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)
Common period 03 Jan 2013 – 20 Aug 2026, limited by ICICI Prudential Bond Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.
View as table
| Date | Kotak Bond Fund | ICICI Prudential Bond Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 03 Jan 2013 | ₹100.00 | ₹100.00 |
| 22 Feb 2014 | ₹102.73 | ₹104.85 |
| 13 Apr 2015 | ₹121.12 | ₹123.24 |
| 31 May 2016 | ₹131.13 | ₹134.70 |
| 20 Jul 2017 | ₹148.63 | ₹152.13 |
| 08 Sep 2018 | ₹149.42 | ₹156.60 |
| 28 Oct 2019 | ₹170.63 | ₹177.43 |
| 15 Dec 2020 | ₹195.40 | ₹201.63 |
| 03 Feb 2022 | ₹201.28 | ₹206.15 |
| 25 Mar 2023 | ₹212.45 | ₹220.42 |
| 13 May 2024 | ₹232.85 | ₹241.40 |
| 01 Jul 2025 | ₹258.84 | ₹269.45 |
| 20 Aug 2026 | ₹272.97 | ₹284.20 |
| Metric | Kotak Mahindra · Direct NAV ₹91.18 Moderate risk ★★★☆☆ | ICICI Prudential · Direct NAV ₹45.11 Moderate risk ★★★★☆ | Category median Medium to Long Duration Fund · 13 funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| +5.98%Best in row | +5.76% | +5.35% | |
| +7.56% | +7.59% | +7.12% | |
| +6.49% | +6.66%Best in row | +6.38% | |
| +7.02% | +7.33%Best in row | +6.82% | |
| +7.66% | +7.97%Best in row | +7.60% | |
| +7.06% | +7.20%Best in row | — | |
| +7.87% | +8.11%Best in row | +7.74% | |
| +7.68% | +7.90%Best in row | +7.57% | |
| +7.80% | +8.03%Best in row | +7.69% | |
| Risk | |||
| 2.15% | 1.97%Best in row | 2.08% | |
| 0.49 | 0.55Best in row | 0.23 | |
| 0.69 | 0.78Best in row | 0.31 | |
| -9.92%Best in row | -10.20% | -9.92% | |
| 0.74% | 0.59%Best in row | 0.74% | |
| ₹1,834Cr | ₹2,482Cr | ₹362.12Cr | |
| ₹100 | ₹1.00K | — | |
| ₹100 | ₹5.00K | — | |
| Abhishek Bisen | Manish Banthia | — | |
| 02 Jan 2013 | 03 Jan 2013 | — | |
| 22.4% | 4.6% | — | |
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
- Benchmark
- —
- Alpha
- —
- Beta
- —
- Upside capture
- —
- Downside capture
- —
- Exit load
- None
- Lock-in
- None
- Portfolio turnover
- —
- Holdings
- —
- Top 10 weight
- —
Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Bond Fund or ICICI Prudential Bond Fund?
Over the last 3 years, ICICI Prudential Bond Fund returned +7.59% CAGR against Kotak Bond Fund's +7.56%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Bond Fund +6.49% vs ICICI Prudential Bond Fund +6.66% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.
Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Bond Fund or ICICI Prudential Bond Fund?
ICICI Prudential Bond Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Bond Fund charges 0.74% a year against ICICI Prudential Bond Fund's 0.59%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.
Which fund is riskier — Kotak Bond Fund or ICICI Prudential Bond Fund?
Kotak Bond Fund has shown higher volatility (+2.15% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Bond Fund's +1.97%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Bond Fund -1.78% vs ICICI Prudential Bond Fund -1.71%.
Which fund manages more money — Kotak Bond Fund or ICICI Prudential Bond Fund?
ICICI Prudential Bond Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Bond Fund manages ₹1,834Cr against ICICI Prudential Bond Fund's ₹2,482Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.
Are Kotak Bond Fund and ICICI Prudential Bond Fund in the same category?
Yes — both are Medium to Long Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.
Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.