Skip to content
WealthTicker

Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund vs UTI Banking & PSU Fund

Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct) and UTI Banking & PSU Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Banking and PSU Fund schemes — see the best banking & psu mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026

Kotak Banking and PSU Debt FundDirectUTI Banking & PSU FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 06 Feb 201420 Aug 2026, limited by UTI Banking & PSU Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateKotak Banking and PSU Debt FundUTI Banking & PSU Fund
06 Feb 2014₹100.00₹100.00
23 Feb 2015₹109.76₹109.75
10 Mar 2016₹119.55₹119.84
27 Mar 2017₹132.10₹133.62
12 Apr 2018₹141.65₹143.14
29 Apr 2019₹152.69₹150.79
14 May 2020₹171.55₹154.62
31 May 2021₹185.70₹163.54
16 Jun 2022₹191.42₹176.72
03 Jul 2023₹206.33₹191.27
18 Jul 2024₹223.14₹205.77
04 Aug 2025₹244.91₹225.06
20 Aug 2026₹258.71₹238.71
Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund, UTI Banking & PSU Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Banking and PSU Fund median.
Metric
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹72.77
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
UTI · Direct
NAV ₹23.91
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Banking and PSU Fund · 20 funds
+5.93%+6.01%+5.50%
+7.53%+7.47%+7.29%
+6.61%+7.67%Best in row+6.30%
+7.49%Best in row+6.57%+7.24%
+8.10%Best in row+7.19%+7.54%
+7.13%+7.48%Best in row
+7.88%Best in row+6.85%+7.52%
+7.81%Best in row+6.46%+7.48%
+7.86%Best in row+6.94%+7.58%
Risk
1.16%0.81%Best in row1.05%
0.891.20Best in row0.74
1.311.85Best in row1.10
-2.84%Best in row-6.74%-2.96%
0.40%0.22%Best in row0.35%
₹5,070Cr₹1,483Cr₹2,803Cr
₹100₹500
₹100₹500
Abhishek BisenAnurag Mittal
14 Aug 201306 Feb 2014
3.5%2.5%
10 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Exit load
None
Lock-in
None
Portfolio turnover
Holdings
Top 10 weight

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund returned +7.53% CAGR against UTI Banking & PSU Fund's +7.47%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund +6.61% vs UTI Banking & PSU Fund +7.67% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Fund?

UTI Banking & PSU Fund has the lower expense ratio: Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund charges 0.40% a year against UTI Banking & PSU Fund's 0.22%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Fund?

Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund has shown higher volatility (+1.16% annualized vs UTI Banking & PSU Fund's +0.81%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund -0.63% vs UTI Banking & PSU Fund -0.41%.

Which fund manages more money — Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Fund?

Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund is the larger fund: Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund manages ₹5,070Cr against UTI Banking & PSU Fund's ₹1,483Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Banking and PSU Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.