Skip to content
WealthTicker

ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund vs Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund

ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund (Direct) and Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Low Duration Fund schemes — see the best low duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 25 Aug 2026

ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term FundDirectKotak Ultra Short to Short Term FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 02 Feb 201525 Aug 2026, limited by Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term FundKotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund
02 Feb 2015₹100.00₹100.00
20 Jan 2016₹108.42₹109.08
06 Jan 2017₹118.38₹119.65
24 Dec 2017₹126.37₹128.60
10 Dec 2018₹135.14₹138.42
27 Nov 2019₹147.24₹151.14
13 Nov 2020₹159.11₹164.20
31 Oct 2021₹166.62₹171.32
18 Oct 2022₹172.62₹177.87
05 Oct 2023₹185.54₹190.95
20 Sep 2024₹199.35₹205.17
07 Sep 2025₹214.95₹221.63
25 Aug 2026₹228.53₹235.54
ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund, Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Low Duration Fund median.
Metric
ICICI Prudential · Direct
NAV ₹593.83
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹3,924.91
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Low Duration Fund · 25 funds
+6.49%+6.41%+6.31%
+7.50%+7.53%+7.38%
+6.68%+6.72%+6.58%
+7.15%+7.38%Best in row+6.80%
+7.75%+7.69%+7.19%
+7.31%+7.30%
+7.57%Best in row+7.46%+7.23%
+7.41%Best in row+7.31%+7.04%
+7.50%+7.62%Best in row+7.13%
Risk
0.50%0.51%0.49%
2.001.55
3.472.86
-1.62%-1.50%Best in row-1.36%
0.42%0.40%0.35%
₹12,083Cr₹1,086Cr
Up to 1.00%None
₹5.00K₹100
99%121%
Manish Banthia · 12.9yDeepak Agrawal · 11.6y
02 Jan 201302 Feb 2015
61
10.1%
-0.6%1.6%
7 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹100

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund or Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund returned +7.53% CAGR against ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund's +7.50%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund +6.68% vs Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund +6.72% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund or Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund?

Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund has the lower expense ratio: ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund charges 0.42% a year against Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund's 0.40%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund or Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund?

Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.51% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund's +0.50%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund -0.21% vs Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund -0.24%.

Are ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund and Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Low Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.