Skip to content
WealthTicker

ICICI Prudential Savings Fund vs Kotak Low Duration Fund

ICICI Prudential Savings Fund (Direct) and Kotak Low Duration Fund (Direct) head to head: growth of ₹100, returns across every window, risk, cost, and portfolio overlap — every figure computed from AMFI NAV history, nothing supplied by a fund house. Both are Low Duration Fund schemes — see the best low duration mutual funds for the full ranking.

Head to head

NAVs as of 20 Aug 2026

ICICI Prudential Savings FundDirectKotak Low Duration FundDirect2 of 4 funds

Growth of ₹100 (rebased over the selected window)

Common period 02 Feb 201520 Aug 2026, limited by Kotak Low Duration Fund. Every series is rebased to ₹100 at the start of this window.

View as table
Growth of ₹100, sampled across the common period
DateICICI Prudential Savings FundKotak Low Duration Fund
02 Feb 2015₹100.00₹100.00
19 Jan 2016₹108.41₹109.09
05 Jan 2017₹118.32₹119.61
22 Dec 2017₹126.37₹128.60
09 Dec 2018₹135.12₹138.43
25 Nov 2019₹147.15₹151.02
11 Nov 2020₹159.01₹164.10
28 Oct 2021₹166.72₹171.35
14 Oct 2022₹172.31₹177.59
01 Oct 2023₹185.34₹190.70
16 Sep 2024₹199.18₹204.94
03 Sep 2025₹214.85₹221.51
20 Aug 2026₹228.36₹235.42
ICICI Prudential Savings Fund, Kotak Low Duration Fund compared on return, risk, benchmark-relative, cost and portfolio metrics, against the Low Duration Fund median.
Metric
ICICI Prudential · Direct
NAV ₹593.40
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★★
Kotak Mahindra · Direct
NAV ₹3,922.99
Low to Moderate risk
★★★★☆
Category median
Low Duration Fund · 25 funds
+6.47%+6.43%+6.31%
+7.52%+7.56%+7.40%
+6.69%+6.73%+6.57%
+7.15%+7.38%Best in row+6.80%
+7.75%+7.70%+7.19%
+7.57%Best in row+7.46%+7.23%
+7.41%Best in row+7.31%+7.04%
+7.50%+7.63%Best in row+7.14%
Risk
0.49%0.51%0.49%
2.081.57
3.623.00
-1.62%-1.50%Best in row-1.36%
1.03%0.40%Best in row0.35%
₹29,481Cr₹13,954Cr₹1,734Cr
Up to 1.00%None
₹5.00K₹100
99%110%
Darshil DedhiaDeepak Agrawal
02 Jan 201302 Feb 2015
61
10.1%
-0.6%1.6%
8 rows carry the same value for every fund — show
5Y SIP XIRR
+7.32%
Benchmark
Alpha
Beta
Upside capture
Downside capture
Lock-in
None
Min SIP
₹100

Best marks the strongest value in a row, and only where the gap is bigger than noise — a near-tie is left unmarked rather than dressed up as a result. SIP XIRR is a ₹10,000/month instalment over 5 years of real NAV history. Nothing here is supplied by a fund house. For research only — not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which fund has delivered higher returns — ICICI Prudential Savings Fund or Kotak Low Duration Fund?

Over the last 3 years, Kotak Low Duration Fund returned +7.56% CAGR against ICICI Prudential Savings Fund's +7.52%, computed from AMFI NAV history. Over 5 years: ICICI Prudential Savings Fund +6.69% vs Kotak Low Duration Fund +6.73% CAGR. Past returns don't guarantee future performance.

Which fund is cheaper — ICICI Prudential Savings Fund or Kotak Low Duration Fund?

Kotak Low Duration Fund has the lower expense ratio: ICICI Prudential Savings Fund charges 1.03% a year against Kotak Low Duration Fund's 0.40%. The expense ratio is deducted from the NAV daily, so a lower one compounds in the investor's favour.

Which fund is riskier — ICICI Prudential Savings Fund or Kotak Low Duration Fund?

Kotak Low Duration Fund has shown higher volatility (+0.51% annualized vs ICICI Prudential Savings Fund's +0.49%), measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over the trailing 3 years. Worst 3-year drawdown: ICICI Prudential Savings Fund -0.21% vs Kotak Low Duration Fund -0.24%.

Which fund manages more money — ICICI Prudential Savings Fund or Kotak Low Duration Fund?

ICICI Prudential Savings Fund is the larger fund: ICICI Prudential Savings Fund manages ₹29,481Cr against Kotak Low Duration Fund's ₹13,954Cr in assets. Size cuts both ways — scale lowers costs, but a very large fund can find it harder to move in and out of positions.

Are ICICI Prudential Savings Fund and Kotak Low Duration Fund in the same category?

Yes — both are Low Duration Fund schemes, so their returns, risk and cost are directly comparable against the same peer set.

Figures update daily from AMFI NAV history; ratings and ranks are WealthTicker’s own — see the methodology. This is data, not investment advice.